Recent Activities

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Chimere -

    Replied to the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Post
    ah yes I don’t play world power in historical. Too easy. On 100 players map you can’t really I guess.
  • DoctorDR1 -

    Liked Road2Victory’s post in the thread How to Pave The Road to Victory.

    Like (Post)
    Or you could just have my name, thanks for the reference. I will be speaking to my lawyer for infringing on copyright use. jk.
  • AdmiralEloc -

    Posted the thread New Roleplay Group looking for members!.

    Thread
    Greetings Call of War players! Whether you play this game because you are a history fan, or just love strategy games in general, I'm sure many of us can agree that roleplaying in normal rounds is always difficult as there is always that one player who…
  • zecevi123 -

    Liked Tornvalor10’s post in the thread I hope I am wrong... about 1.5 and Classic Maps.

    Like (Post)
    ...Please do not remove classic 100%.
  • zecevi123 -

    Replied to the thread I hope I am wrong... about 1.5 and Classic Maps.

    Post
    I really dont understand why they are making COW like CON. Alot of people only play COW because they didnt like CON. why are you making both games the same? COW is bassicaly CON with ww2 skin now.
  • zecevi123 -

    Liked whowh’s post in the thread I hope I am wrong... about 1.5 and Classic Maps.

    Like (Post)
    CoN is too complicated. Its also hard to understand the units and panning the map is slow.
  • zecevi123 -

    Liked Habo778’s post in the thread I hope I am wrong... about 1.5 and Classic Maps.

    Like (Post)
    You speak truth Jester. Before I found CoW I tried Confict of Nations and quit after my first game. Then I tried CoW 1.0 and loved it from the mechanics to the graphics. CoW 1.5 has truly lost the parts of 1.0 that made me love it so much, when 1.0 gets…
  • zecevi123 -

    Liked JesterTheSheep’s post in the thread I hope I am wrong... about 1.5 and Classic Maps.

    Like (Post)
    *sigh* ...OK. Here's my take on all this. 1.5 is not better or worse than 1.0. It's a good game, for different reasons than 1.0. 1.0 Clearly favors long, protracted battles, which require strategy and patience. 1.5 does not. 1.5 requires a lot of…
  • Last Warrior -

    Replied to the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Post
    Quote from Chimere: “ Another item : I don't know what kind of game you guys are doing, but I have never had the use of massive carrier fleets with 60 spots. Maybe in the Pacific Map which I never played, but embarking 24 planes is already a huge number…
  • General Tarkov -

    Liked z00mz00m’s post in the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Like (Post)
    Quote from whowh: “On that note what do you guys normally put on your carriers? I tend to aim for 4% tactical bombers, 20% attack bombers, 20% naval bombers and 20% interceptors. ” According to your math, there is 36% of unused space on your carriers ;)
  • Agent47 -

    Replied to the thread Whats next?.

    Post
    Way to go on necroing a thread from 5! years ago. God damn and now I am a part of it too...
  • General Tarkov -

    Replied to the thread Bringing It Back.

    Post
    God i remember how rampant the cheating was so many alt accounts on 100 player matches. Dont get me wrong it was good for roleplay but that was it
  • Chimere -

    Replied to the thread Whats next?.

    Post
    The Brits have the Royal Marines The French have the Fusiliers Marins and the very well reputed Commandos-Marine (French Navy SEAL) The Italians had the San Marco Marine Brigade, which were absolute Space Marines and was according to von Arnim (Rommel's…
  • Chimere -

    Liked K.Rokossovski’s post in the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Like (Post)
    All points I was just about to type, Last Warrior. A wise post indeed. Sailing a strong carriergroup into a place like the Mediterranean or the Phillippines/Indonesia/Chinese Sea region can be a deadly blow to an enemy. And carrier bridges are SO…
  • Chimere -

    Replied to the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Post
    Yes, very strong points indeed. Protection from missile shenanigans, especially versus big paying users, is underestimated. In 1.0 I would usually escort carriers, because a submarine group, a fleet or even a bunch of naval bombers can sneak on it while…
  • Chimere -

    Liked Last Warrior’s post in the thread Aircraft carriers..

    Like (Post)
    Carrier croup can be flexible, carriergroup is more safe to rocketattacks than local airfields, Carriers can build inercontinental carrierbridge. Move carrier middle or high level to next area of war is more quickly then build airfields in provinces with…
  • Wüstenrabe -

    Now follows Davutturan.

    Follow
  • Wüstenrabe -

    Now follows mah7777.

    Follow
  • Last Warrior -

    Replied to the thread Whats next?.

    Post
    Sovjet marines called naval infantry... They were used for example in crimea, Leningrad and Stalingrad.
  • Last Warrior -

    Liked cpringle’s post in the thread Is the pace of the game to "fast"?.

    Like (Post)
    I play on and off, but does anyone feel the pace of the game with recent updates is a bit to fast? I'm just curious to know your thoughts. I liked the pace of the older games, and felt like I didn't have to check on my armies, country and resources as…