Search Results

Quote from z00mz00m: “If you pick a major power, you should win solo. The major powers are OP already, combining them is OP^N. ” 100%. I've tried USA twice and am convinced that it can solo the map 90% of the time. It's basically impossible to lose, and the only thing that can stop you from soloing would be a European coalition that wins before you can. I wouldn't recommend teaming with anyone, certainly not joining any coalitions. Message Germany to try to stave off a day-one invasion and watch…

I guess we wait, then. It's not like the discord is usable anyways; for every 5 seconds of conversation about the game itself you have to wade through an hour of racism, edgelording, and trolling.

I haven't noticed anything in discord other than the usual trolling/toxicity that you'd expect from teenage boys, unfortunately, but I don't frequent the other areas. Is the answer more mods? What are you proposing here?

Where is this happening?

And the cards are the same each day? I feel like I've had the same mix every day, haven't seen any oil or rares boosters.

I agree, I don't need even more of an advantage over my less-active opponents. I wouldn't mind some sort of cosmetic change, though. We're already tracking kills by unit/stack, so it'd be cool to visualize that in some way. I don't have a good idea off the top of my head though.

I don't really have a "usually" since I've just been using this map as a testing ground and have only played it the three times, but I wanted Nat China, USA, and USA and was able to snag all three. Each time I think the counter showed some nonzero number of participants but I was still able to be the first person to join, according to the newspaper. Another note is that you can actually join too fast, when the map hasn't loaded yet, forcing you back to the menu to try again. This happened at lea…

I dunno what I'm doing right but I'm 3 for 3 in joining HWW games immediately after spawn and being the first one to choose a country. I haven't used this power to play as Germany yet but maybe I need to give it a shot. Also worth noting that the number of players you see (e.g. 4/30) is the number of players who have clicked join; not necessarily all of them have chosen a country so don't just assume the one you want is taken. And I 100% agree with wishing the major powers were more active, it's…

Lol OK

Quote from Fox-Company: “Quote from jubjub bird: “Do you have a scout unit nearby? I wonder if there's a neutral stealth army there preventing you from capturing. ” This was like 3 weeks ago, and no, it was nothing, my militia just refused to capture it, so my ally came by and captured it with no resistance. ” I was asking OP, not you

Do you have a scout unit nearby? I wonder if there's a neutral stealth army there preventing you from capturing.

Quote from Fox-Company: “Quote from jubjub bird: “The newspaper doesn't report convoys killed as convoys AFAIK. The spy intel doesn't go away after you see the units. As far as I can tell, the spy intel is tied to the stack's number (e.g. 5th division), so when you come across that same stack again the intel will populate the stack with whatever it happened to be at the time of intel. Would you rather that stack show up as an unknown army, even though your spies revealed the composition of it? ”…

The newspaper doesn't report convoys killed as convoys AFAIK. The spy intel doesn't go away after you see the units. As far as I can tell, the spy intel is tied to the stack's number (e.g. 5th division), so when you come across that same stack again the intel will populate the stack with whatever it happened to be at the time of intel. Would you rather that stack show up as an unknown army, even though your spies revealed the composition of it?

It did. You're seeing the unit as it was at the time of espionage (or when a plane patrolled over it), when it was a convoy. Look back at the picture, it's in the distant view range and has a spy image next to it.

There's nothing to report, it's left over from espionage.

There are two threads with the exact same title, both started by you

Why are there multiple threads on the same topic

It'd get abused too much by multiaccounting

It's been talked about (and encouraged, by some) in the discord for a while, so I think you've got causality reversed--I think the increase in people using this tactic has led to an increase in forum threads.

I assume boosters are both more likely to be used and less abusable than gold but idk, that's just from thinking about it. They've probably got stats on usage and stuff and decided it was a good idea. Gold-free matches, the kind that can be verified by the game operator or whoever, are also booster-free matches right?