Search Results

6/5/4/3 I think

America Homefront is already alternate-history-ish. Might as well apply some new doctrines or randomization to it to spice things up. Pan Asian in the west, Axis in the south, comintern in the Midwest, allies in the northeast, whatever just add some variety. I'd love to see randomized doctrines, or some sort of options like choose one of the following: - doctrine - resource spread - country location Make every game different and make players adjust to new scenarios. Homefront map would be perfec…

It was pretty smart of the devs to put Hawaii out there tbh

If we're counting dicking around games, I'm pretty sure I've produced 300+ RRG in a single game. That should count for something too

You start with like 300 so that seems a little low

444 right now on day 21 of a Tibet solo, as another data point. Likely to end after day 22

We need more details than that to figure out what happened.

Now just ban him

I think it was to reduce the ability (or increase the cost) to gold-spam day 1 troops to overwhelm neighbors. In my memory it happened at the same time as the change to starting Rare Mats to reduce the ability for comintern to overwhelm neighbors with golded rocket arty, but I'm not confident in that--it might have been separate changes.

Build more industry, sooner. Expand faster to capture resources. Buy from the market when prices are good.

Those are pretty terrible stacks so you should be able to kill them with whatever you want. LTs, MTs, RRGs, bombers, your own bigger arty stacks...

Be better than them or die

Quote from _Pyth0n_: “A regular rural makes 450/day at 100% morale, whilst a city makes 600/day at 100%. ” Quote: “spending on rurals very close to the capital (so their morale is the closest to 100%) very early game is worth more than in cities ” Uh Some cities day 1. All cities by day 3 or 4. Rurals after.

My point is that RRG stacks aren't unbeatable if they're played by a bad player, which most are. The particular flavor of their idiocy will determine how to attack them. Insufficient support units? Attack their weakness, whether with tanks or with air. Too many meat shields? You can have more RRG than they do, because they've wasted manpower elsewhere, and will win the fight from range. Put all their units into a single doom stack? Run around it with fast units like AC/LT/MI. In the hands of a g…

Like every other thread on gold, this is just whining. If you honestly think that every game that ends in 15 days is being won with gold then you just aren't very good. The vast majority of players are F2P.

There aren't any 3-5 player maps lol

I have 1 million gold, you're saying I can only play against people with that amount? That's absurd, those games would never fill. And your approach makes no sense, amusingly, because many (most?) of the people with that much gold in their account have it because they don't gold. Sorry you ran into a blatant golder. They're pretty uncommon, I've run into one extreme golder in 50 games. Fight back if you like the challenge, dump your own gold on them if you've been saving up, or just archive and …

Ohhh now I get what they meant. Yea, good catch.

They are definitely stationed in your territory, not an ally's? And the province didn't revolt or anything? If so, it should be immediate at day change. If your troops have close to full health (only missing 0.1 HP, for example) you may not see a change, but otherwise it's 15% of missing HP. They don't have to be still and they don't have to be in territory for any amount of time--as long as they're over the line at day change, even if they only make it by a few seconds, they'll heal.

I'm talking about WaW Maybe nukes could come into play in HWW if you start as a small country, since it takes time to ramp up and the map starts with 6 days of research To the original point of the thread, if your RRG solution is "build nukes" you've either already lost or you're playing against an idiot and don't need nukes to beat them. Either way, nukes aren't the answer