Search Results

Quote from BladeFisher: “ So on that, why was the game designed that way? From a maritime perspective there is this heirarchy I think so a DD goes in with a BB and on leaving that comes out as a different force number. Dont get it, but hey ho. ” The answer to questions like this is usually: Because this system was designed 15 years ago (for the first version of Supremacy 1914) and wasn't touched since then. You can be sure that many systems from back then were not developed in the most optimal w…

Quote from NEPTUNE the great: “Quote from Komrade Khrushchev: “Should we ping, or go to his wall? ” We should go to his wall ” This topic is hardly important enough to awake me from my slumber, sorry An auto-filter may help but won't solve all problems. We have auto-filters for chat messages and for name registration since a long time and people can easily circumvent them. Static filters really only catch a small fraction. I guess we could use better ones, perhaps AI driven, but it also comes at…

Quote from K.Rokossovski: “I'm sorry, but if this would be really true, you have a huge PR problem, because none of the core/advanced/senior/experienced/coin-free players that I know (and there are many) believe this. We believe this was not a "nitty gritty detail", but the primary reason to introduce mana... erm, I mean war bonds. Gold shaming has been very real since I started playing this game many years ago, thus making it a huge problem for Bytro (they don't want players who pay them money …

Quote from vonlettowvorbeck: “@freezy Quote from vonlettowvorbeck: “@freezyQuestions on WBs: 1. Is a player who's cities are taken, but still has some provinces, still accumulating WBs? 2. And if that player is rather frustrated, can he still insta-sabotage, even though he is practically out of the game? (in a particular case, it seems the player in question is very focussed on male genitals and all the places these could go and doesn't mind informing others by DM and newspaper about his 'fantas…

Quote from Hornetkeeper: “2. Most of those arguments are weird though, as the standard graphics could be set by default and Canvas only for those who choose it voluntarily (so no one would complain of lacking 3D graphics...) The only reason I understand (maybe I'm stupid) is the mobile version and new features/options, because it could've been very inconvenient implementing them in Canvas mode (so just drop Canvas altogether to save your time). ” Maintaining 2 versions in parallel was out of sco…

We gave reasons for disabling the Canvas renderer though, there was a long forum discussion thread about it where I personally elaborated on that in detail. Main reasons were: Meet market standards and today's player expectations (they compare games and nowadays most successful strategy games have good 3d graphics (even now we are still lacking in this department)), make the game attractive to new players again so we can continue to grow the game, enable new graphical features and options which …

Quote from Hornetkeeper: “Master Androv, your post is simple and brilliant! I wish freezy notices this. Suggestion 1 and 2 especially. All it takes (for freezy) is good old client-side 'programming' like 2 buttons ( plus: game.canGold = true; // or: game.canGold = false; game.entryPrice = 20000; player.hasGold(amount){ // boolean, extracts $amount upon returning true // add 2 rows: if !this.game.canGold return false; // haha, what do you do now Libya? ... } ), and a casual 8-hour conversation wi…

There is a very active discussion on the official Discord going on btw, where lots of feedback has already been shared and noted. You can chime in there: discord.com/channels/861599559176028180/1263434221775618058 So there will be further adjustments down the line.

lol I closed this s**thole of a thread

Quote from NEPTUNE the great: “Wish I saw this earlier, looks fun! Sad I can’t buy it. I’m broke at the moment ” Thanks and don't worry, it's not out yet anyway, will be in development for a while. But you can wishlist it already and inform others about it, that would help!

It was about distributing them a bit so we dont have 1 full wall of Pan Asian and 1 full wall of Axis on either side. But I think there wasnt a historical reason for why Orgeon got Pan Asian.

Just for fun! I guess you joined the new version of the Homefront map where we distributed more Doctrines on the map to make it more exciting. I mean who only wants to play Allies vs. Allies on that map...

they have some additiona usages: Since they are the fastest naval unit, you can also use them to: 1) quickly scout out sea routes 2) hunt down convoys (they arent as effective in fighting them as other units, but they can intercept them quicker) 3) lock down enemy fleeing ships. Even if the destroyers will be killed in battle, they can lock down the enemy until your real fleet can catch up.

For anyone who needs the concrete cost values: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u…Oy4jcjUmUNYx8sh3cMnc/edit

Yes can still be done.

hype

Fix was just released now.

That's known, it will be corrected in the next balancing update.

The bug was hotfixed on Thursday last week btw, so it should not occur anymore now. If you had any losses from this bug you can contact support and attach the newspaper article of the reported losses, you may be able to get compensation for it.

Quote from freezy: “Problem is known and a hotfix should come today. Until it is fixed the workaround is to not have more than 1 army in the vicinity of the province when trying to conquer it. So send the other armies away or merge together, then give new command to the remaining army. Right now multiple armies block eachother from conquering. ”