Search Results

yes, but you can't do that if you are forced into battles. Many great armies have retreated, and survived

Quote from vonlettowvorbeck: “I was merely stating a point of view about the realism of COW, based on verifiable facts. As you (should) know 'Politics' is synonymous with 'lies'. I don't do 'politics'; only common sense, based on knowledge of history (verifiable facts), and the latter always repeats. With a basically 2 party system (like the UK or US) people only can choose between 2 evils. Harris for instance could not ever be where she is if she were an 'angel'; neither could Trump. And believ…

guys, let's just agree, bytro is milking the game, and we should stop playing

Quote from litenew: “I think I'm going to like this change. With rares and goods there were too many resources. I can't wait to try out this new resource system. I'll be able to build the necessary units and buildings and continue production of my war machine instead of always missing that one resource that cost 30 cash that some players make it by manipulating the market. I think we'll be able to produce the necessary units when necessary. And buildings too. Maybe we'll see more propaganda offi…

why are you brining politics into the game? Trump is not going to cause the US to fall apart, it didn't happen in his first term, its not going to happen again if he becomes president. He will prevent foreign wars and bring America back economically. If Kamala wins, things could very well take a nose dive. I am not even sure what point you are tying to argue, but COW is a very unrealistic game, I should say that units don't march single file down a road...

I dont get your question?

Quote from Komrade Khrushchev: “Quote from GeneralJames: “on October 23 2 thousand and 4, we where told, and we where told rescorces would be removed. It would take affect soon, rescorces would go away, some people where sleeping, others awake, when we where told rescorces would be removed. On October 23 2 thousand and 4, we where told, and we where told, rescorces would be removed. @Carking the 6th ” It’s 2024 not 2004 ” fine, here is a corrected verson: on October 23 2 thousand and 24, we wher…

another collaborator..

on October 23 2 thousand and 4, we where told, and we where told rescorces would be removed. It would take affect soon, rescorces would go away, some people where sleeping, others awake, when we where told rescorces would be removed. On October 23 2 thousand and 4, we where told, and we where told, rescorces would be removed. @Carking the 6th

yeah

thanks

I actually played endgame, and I remember that's when COW 2.0 released, I was so confused when I saw my ally with a different flag, then I reloaded the tab. (I don't reload tabs when I play COW)

indeed

Oh and in Call of War fashion, all countries would start of with neural relations

Basically, I think we should Have a 1941 Scenario, taking place on the eve of Operation Barbarossa. Germany owns Poland, The Low Countries, France, Parts of Yugoslavia and Part of Grecce. The USSR would own Eastern Poland and the Baltics Japan would own more of China and French Indochina Vichy France would exist Italy would own a little more land in France, and Tunisia, and a little of Egypt (British Egypt does not exist) Germany and Russia would have a bulk of there Forces on their border. The …

the problem is that you HAVE to do a battle, no matter what, adding a retreat feature would make the game more strategic. I think the retreat should not be done automatically, but still

call of war came first. But they are similar. If you want more unique game, play Iron Order 1919, it's got lore and not many players

there are the territories given to Russia and Germany using COW provinces

what does that stand for?

would you be interested in joining it?