Search Results

pity

So t'is my proposal: allow us to make games with speed factors of x150 and beyond. I think it'll make the game more fun because it could now be played in one sitting, and maybe we could even have a trophy system where players who end up first place get say 10 trophies. This is different from gold because having a lot of gold doesn't necessarily mean a player has won a lot of games. Having a lot of experience too isn't a really good indicator of one's capability because one can't lose experience,…

Quote from Alexandera Nevsky: “My CoN stats on the third day playing, in case you think I'm bluffing ” oh good goat thats killer. on a side note I met a player who did what you suggested too, he was at level 10 but had like almost a 19 provinces captured ratio because he captured about 300 provinces but lost only like and I'm not even kidding here 13 provinces.

Quote from GrandEmpire: “To Victory! -My First Solo Win I began the game as General Secretary of the U.S.S.R. My policy was to spread communism, and soon I found allies. Many were willing to join the East Bloc, Japan quickly turned socialist, followed by Mongolia, Iran, Turkey, Romania and Poland. China joined last alongside Australia. However, my socialist movement quickly found enemies too. The United Kingdom, France and the United States created a coalition by the name of NATO, and claimed th…

but google translate is, for now, I hope, is not able to grasp the figurative meaning of the phrase and thus you get (refer to thumbnail) additionally, the idiom 七孔冒烟 is already considered as very simple, so I'll leave it to y' all to imagine what google translate can generate when the idioms get more complicated

Quote from whowh: “The issue with google translate is that it translates word by word (or phrase by phrase). This means that the grammar structure ends up as the same of that of the initial sentence's language. Also, the Ai has to guess which of the numerous translations to use ” something like this but with respect to the Chinese language, g. translate does things exceptionally terribly. you see, Chinese idioms, which are usually 4 words long, are made up in this format: 2 words + 2 words, so t…

Quote from h4zel: “Quote from fayizz: “Don't worry of Google as there are many sources which show true translations. I have tested myself. ” Can you tell me some, then? Quote from Conquerer74: “what do you need to translate. if its only a short sentence then just use translate ” I would but other sites give other things as translation. Do you speak Chinese? ” i do

Quote from h4zel: “I gotta translate a few things but can't trust google because of trashy translation. ” i can help.

Quote from Lawrence Czl: “LIGHT, MEDIUM and HEAVY tanks ” these are all the tanks what are you talking about lol at least in 1.0

Quote from K.Rokossovski: “What would this achieve? I mean, storing it and later retrieving it is exactly the same as having it all the time? The only use would be to save these resources from being "taken" by your enemy when they conquer your land, but this works exactly as designed. In fact here already IS a loophole for that, putting it on the market against an improbable market price; the 10% trading fee was (unjustly, unjustly!!) partly introduced to mitigate this effect. ” it can help when…

Quote from Hans A. Pils: “If you say this would overload the player profiles, remove the display of desktop/mobile usage, because nobody really is interested in that. ” hello, that ratio is rly important okay. it lets you know what device your ally/opponent is using because there are some units that are really mobile-unfriendly

Quote from GGBugh: “I believe there should be a ranking for how often a player goes inactive. A player's ranking starts at 1000. If the player goes inactive, when the game ends his ranking will go down the day the game ended minus the day he went inactive (eg. game ends on day 50 and player when IA on 25, ranking goes down by 25). Alternatively, if the player stays in the game until the end, his ranking does up by the number of day the game lasted divided by 2 (game lasts 20 days, score goes up …

no

uhhh, i dont know. havent played 1.5 for a long time

Quote from Dr. Leipreachán: “humsan ” * human i believe

Quote from ATruePatriot: “Hello Everybody On The Forum! I'm a Very new player in fact,just started S1914 And CoW Yesterday! I'm in a 22 P Map {Tutorial} In order for me to even be seen as a potential HM Elite Commando, I Must Win my first ever game to prove myself worthy! I need all the possible advice I can get on tactics,strategy and how to defeat my tougher enemies and more if possible! I'm New here, only a Private on Real CoW (Technically a Recruit) ! I hope you guys can help! ” lemme try to…

Quote from KriegMaker: “Two level 4 barracks ” i suppose you are talking about CoW 1.5?

Quote from Jacques Thomas: “That game has been going on for nearly a month. It is much too old to allow new players to join. This is to prevent people from sabotaging the integrity of the game. You and your friend will have to find a new game to join together. ” oh, okay thanks

Okay so im a game admin in game 3354872 and i removed all the inactive players and told my friend to join, but apparently the page says he's not yet accepted so he cant enter the game. Do any of y'all know what to do?

Quote from Conquerer74: “Usually, forts are more effective in mountains like in the alps where the italiens build forts. also forts tend to be weaker on plains like on the magniot line. so many forts should be twice as effective when built in mountains but only half as effective in plains. ” seems a valid point to me but it might be hard to code?