Search Results

I dont remember when I put them all my team on shared map I will see and I hope it work like you said and get a RoW. Having relation choice on ennemy team it a little weird, but it can serve for diplomatic separate peace term. Otherwise it will be best to restrict that maybe just to prevent Ai giving it to anyone. For player treatrise and double play it a part of the war so Im not against shared map but again it can give the same abuse if the enemy use the territory and that you juste have peace…

Ok thank. I have send a report but it not specefic to just that game it doing that in all my others team game of Historical WW2 25 players. Even on my game of Mediterranea 4 players it the same thing. For the the AI to accept what it best Im not sure it working either. I have put them all of my team on shared map and none have put me on right of way and it was long time ago. Im pretty sure it a bug there either because I cant put them on right of way just on shared map, maybe Ai got the same iss…

Here a pic to show the problem Im in blue team(Turquie) and I can give green team(Usa) what I want but for blue team(Allemagne) only shared map option. Royaume-Uni was the one I got a shared map before he pass inactive, so for him it gave right way automaticly.bug.jpg

I got a serious problem. I joined a team game on the historic world map. But almost all my team go inactive before I got the share map. SO when the AI took control Im just in peace with them. For the guy with who I got a shared map it passed on right of way automaticly. The problem it I cant place them on the right of way option only on share map relation. But the AI never accept share map relation as I know. The big issue it the the ennemy team can got a right of way on them. So the guy just us…

I dont think it a step forward but back, you should have increase the time of research, and put more slot than 2 in research. If you take the time the travel on map vs time to research, it not have any sense. You research the T-34 tank for exemple most used tank in the war, but 4 day of use laters it already obselete. So the people will just concentrate on secret research and built missile and bomb. For me when people begin to have nuclear thing it when it should end not begin and it when I most…

*sorry for my english I got misunderstood again not my 1st language Im no noob I played supremacy 1914 before this game and I playing this one since the french server are up. Well was not a problem for me until I played on this map. I got 155 provinces now and I have only 165 units. Never in my other games I had to turn off all my barrack like this, at least I was able to keep one or 2 running for building mech-inf. On this one I didnt even bother to research mot-inf and mech-inf. Keeping provin…

It bad and this map need to be adjust I dont have the army to keep order in all my conquered territory. I have like 30k manpower but cant build anything because im short in oil and grain, so I build milicia and send them as canon fodder and hopping that they get kill fast will keeping my precious few tank beyond the line. I hope they made I better map with real country border too, and where we can field large army and fleet without to have to make gore border. 100 people world map not a so bad i…

I just played as South USA, one oil and one rare province are bad because you will need boat with 3 of yours mains city's are on coast. But over supply and iron with 3 grains provinces on the coast. Lot of neighbour and coast so risk of invasion from anywere. Anyway they fun with a nice flag and New-Orleans as capital.

In a game I joined some month ago, it had some member of an alliance and they was sending army to there leader, they ganked everyone one by one and it was bad and the leader was unbeatable, but it one of worst you can get on, even than a premium player. Otherwise building units and not loosing them are the best option for normal players. Best kill ratio are often Artillery, tactical bomber and Battleship.

Anyway with no combat log it hard to tell what really happens, but Im pretty sure I took damage when my reinforcement merged with the army already engaged only since 30 minutes.

Quote from Butter Ball Bill: “Quote from Martinskyboy: “jet planes ” We already have jets. Quote from Martinskyboy: “human-torpedo of Japan. ” Talked about, just the Italian version. ” Oh! I just saw that interceptor upgrade to jet planes I never realized +1 for you.

Yes we need all class, but 1st I want air-plane carrier. Escort-carrier will be nice, and near 44 for super-carrier. Different class of cruiser too are important. But with all the new increased upkeep and production cost it going wrong way, we will not able to field big army and navy. Wiki quote: ''By war's end in 1945, the United States Navy had added nearly 1,200 major combatant ships, including 27 aircraft carriers and 8 battleships, and had over 70% of the world's total numbers and total ton…

Maybe adding SAM at the 1950 tech tree will be a good idea. Helicopter, and jet planes are other nice idea for late tech. But more early like the BA-349 you talk are much rare, or only for some nation, a little like the human-torpedo of Japan.

I just wonder too how it may work because I just lost an important battle this way. I had the advantage of defense in this battle. Usualy I use the attack button to reinforce the battle but this time the combat was engaged but opponent tried to retreat just before entering close combat and it stayed like this all combat lenght. So I used the march button this time to my army spot. Normally I think damage are calculate every hour, but my reinforcement seem to took damage just 30 min. after alread…

Yes I know ! Even in our day we have difficulty to intercept balistic rocket. Quote from Martinskyboy: “...There strengh are much that they cant be intercept, otherwise they was costly to build and not very usuful except for inspire terror in population. So how they can even hit an unit and even more for planes? Even the rocket-artillery used in mass by Staline, did not do much damage, this one was good again for terror and can just mostly kill infantry.... ”

Thank for reply! I never wonder how V-2 rocket can do as much damage to units at least. They was able to do some minor damage to building and that was when they hitting a target. And I still wonder if it them who doing so much damage to my plane. So I i think they should just have building damage modifier, and very low. There strengh are much that they cant be intercept, otherwise they was costly to build and not very usuful except for inspire terror in population. So how they can even hit an un…

Something just happens to me when I bombarded an ennemy provinces with my tactical bomber and where my ground army was engage too. I saw ennemy rocket going up and then strike there own province. I lost half my army in the strike and 1/4 of my plane. Maybe the plane was lost just against ground defense. But it is an automatic defense for Ai to launch missile like this? Or it a bug? It was not trigger before my plane bombing. ..sorry about my english.

Quote from Butter Ball Bill: “Quote from GeneralPhara: “No offense, but why does that matter for you, the guy had a point and that Rocket Fighters -a useless unit that YOU said it yourself to be so in the Naval bomber vs Tac bomber thread- was added despite that it contributed less compared to para in WW 2 ” But you see, those were already here when I came and I have used naval bombers once or twice(albeit they were stolen from someone else). Naval bombers would be better if they had bigger rang…

Yes in fact ww2 was the begin of many special task units, before in history elite troop was like pretorian guard in Rome or imperial guard of Napoleon. Because they use the terms of special force for commando like Navy Seal, it why maybe they dont call them special unit.I think they use elite terms for units with unconventionl task and different training,even sometimes political like NKVD, Waffen-SS or Blackshirt. Paratroop was used alot in Normandy but of my knowing of WW2 history they was not …

Elite force are for non conventional fighting like paradrop and amphibious assault, and Special force are like the navy Seal. And don't argue please it on yahoo answer ! answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100122142247AAxqZWy