Alliances have a strict limit on the number of players - no more than 20 players. Many alliances are already filled. They have to remove the good players and refuse to accept new ones. In my opinion it should not happen so harshly. This game is new, and there is a complex process of the formation of new communities - need to provide more freedom for the alliance and expand the limit. Many alliances are formed on the basis of language or national principle, and if a player knows only the language and want to play with compatriots he had no choice but to try to join the alliance, which has the same language. If this alliance is full and you can not accept it, it is likely that it just will not play at all. Such problem in our alliance, and I see that there is a problem in other alliances. I am confident that the expansion of the limit immediately lead to an increase in the activity of team games and then the popularity of the game in general.
Limit players in alliances
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
We should totally expand the limit.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Leader of Eagle Cohorts. We should expand the limit. 20 members is way too little.
-
As leader of US Marines, I also do agree. Many top ranked alliances, or just active ones, may want to play many alliance games at once, in order to hold or advance their position. 20 people is typically too low to support that amount, especially with larger maps coming out now. I propose a way to win or buy more space. One way would be that an alliance player limit could be extended based on games won, such as 1st game won = +1 to alliance limit, then, to slow progress, it would be 2 more games won = +1 to limit, then 3 more games = +1, and so on. Another way would be to buy more spaces with goldmark donated into an alliance treasury. Either way, it allows alliances to advance without getting too many people.
-
I agree General A 11. I like the idea where player limit is extended based on games won. We would have like 2-3 extra players.
-
I heard version made available expansion limit for gold.
I also have its own version - the alliance structure into groups of 20 players each. The leader directs the moderators, moderators supervise his group of players. In larger communities there will be more order.
Maybe there will be other ideas. But I think we should not talk about it right now, otherwise the discussion can take a long time, need to extend the limit as soon as possible. -
How many do you think we should expand to? 25? 30?35?
-
A drunk 8...
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Iamyourfather... wrote:
How many do you think we should expand to? 25? 30?35?
-
I think that should be expanded the limit, at least until 50 as S1914. In my opinion, the limit should be static because in this way all alliances are on equal terms.Nuestro ideal es la paz pero la historia es violenta.
-
No, it should be an infinite number. If you can run a bigger organisation than someone else, you should be able to have that advantage here. Anyway, it is not like we can have 100v5 battles, they will always be equal.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Well there might be too much people in one alliance if it's infinite.
-
Who cares? The number doesn't matter when only a certain amount can join a game.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
But there won't be as much alliances to fight if all of them go to like 1 alliance.
-
Hard for us to get wins. No one wants to play us anymore....:(
-
Iamyourfather... wrote:
But there won't be as much alliances to fight if all of them go to like 1 alliance.
The past is a foreign country. -
Pablo22510 wrote:
Iamyourfather... wrote:
But there won't be as much alliances to fight if all of them go to like 1 alliance.
-
Sandevot wrote:
No, you're wrong. there will be many alliances, each of which speaks its own language
The past is a foreign country. -
Pablo22510 wrote:
Sandevot wrote:
No, you're wrong. there will be many alliances, each of which speaks its own language
-
I agree with Sandevot. Anyway, lots of people like to lead. They will want to create their own alliance and get their friends and family to play with them.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0