Which was the best army?

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • How many people Stalin killed depends on how you look at it. These are the FACTS. If you want to go by executions alone, 4-10 million people died in the soviet union from 1929-1953. This isn't as bad as the 30 million, but compare it to the 3,644 people who were executed from 1925-1949 in the US. That's quite a big difference. I don't dislike socialism, I actually support it, but Stalin... I don't like Stalin
    Forum Gang Premier

    you are a balls

  • so was pretty much every president of the us 10 and under, but if power is there, what's morality
    "A knight cannot save the world. They call certain methods of fighting good and others evil, acting as if there were some nobility to the battlefield."

    "Honor? Glory? There's no point in speaking to a killer who indulges in such nonsense."

    "It's a crime we call victory, paid for by the pain of the defeated"

  • GreatbigHippo wrote:

    How many people Stalin killed depends on how you look at it. These are the FACTS. If you want to go by executions alone, 4-10 million people died in the soviet union from 1929-1953. This isn't as bad as the 30 million, but compare it to the 3,644 people who were executed from 1925-1949 in the US. That's quite a big difference. I don't dislike socialism, I actually support it, but Stalin... I don't like Stalin
    4 million is better than 30 million, but even this figure is greatly exaggerated. Where did you get this number, you have a complete list?

    If you're talking about America, I want to ask - who destroyed 99% the Indians?

  • Sandevot wrote:

    GreatbigHippo wrote:

    How many people Stalin killed depends on how you look at it. These are the FACTS. If you want to go by executions alone, 4-10 million people died in the soviet union from 1929-1953. This isn't as bad as the 30 million, but compare it to the 3,644 people who were executed from 1925-1949 in the US. That's quite a big difference. I don't dislike socialism, I actually support it, but Stalin... I don't like Stalin
    4 million is better than 30 million, but even this figure is greatly exaggerated. Where did you get this number, you have a complete list?
    If you're talking about America, I want to ask - who destroyed 99% the Indians?
    The number is only an estimate, so it won't be 100% accurate.

    As for the Indians thing, you make an interesting argument. since 1776, 100,000-500,000 Indians were killed in the United States (I think it's closer to 500,000). It was a horrible thing, but it does not justify what Stalin did.

    After reading your question about the Indians, I took the liberty to research how many slaves died in the United States. The few estimates I can find show 5 million died in just 87 years. Again, even though these genocides happened in countries other than the USSR does not mean it justifies Stalin's actions. I'm sure in the minds of someone, all these things were justified, but having something be justified does not mean it's right.
    Forum Gang Premier

    you are a balls

  • GreatbigHippo wrote:

    Sandevot wrote:


    4 million is better than 30 million, but even this figure is greatly exaggerated. Where did you get this number, you have a complete list?If you're talking about America, I want to ask - who destroyed 99% the Indians?
    The number is only an estimate, so it won't be 100% accurate.
    As for the Indians thing, you make an interesting argument. since 1776, 100,000-500,000 Indians were killed in the United States (I think it's closer to 500,000). It was a horrible thing, but it does not justify what Stalin did.

    After reading your question about the Indians, I took the liberty to research how many slaves died in the United States. The few estimates I can find show 5 million died in just 87 years. Again, even though these genocides happened in countries other than the USSR does not mean it justifies Stalin's actions. I'm sure in the minds of someone, all these things were justified, but having something be justified does not mean it's right.
    I also have not studied this topic, just thinking about it when you said those killed in America. If you brought another example, we can recall other massacres. Britain has killed a lot of people in Asia and Africa, where an overwhelming uprising. Turkey has killed many Armenians and Assyrians. Japan was merciless to captives and killed them big volume - there are many examples of which no one speaks. The last century was very cruel. But during the Cold War, all the propaganda concentrate around one theme - the bad Stalin. Let's analyze the sources that tell you about four million dead and you can be sure that a lot of it is unjust accusations. For example, if a person who was in the prison fell ill and died? Throughout the world, these dead are not on the list of those killed through the fault of the country's leader, right? But if a man died in a Soviet prison in Stalin's time, that is to blame only Stalin. There are many other examples of "foreignness analysts" make the numbers are very large, more than it actually is.