Basically, you want to take out the elements of what make a PL game more fun than normal games.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
dasrafa wrote:
I dont?
The post was edited 1 time, last by Xarus ().
miech wrote:
Please post your opinion about them (optionally of course:) ) if you want to join this game.
1: Alliances must always be published in the newspaper
2: A maximum of 2 allies per player, other players can only be NAP partners.
3: NAPs have a maximum length of 7 game days. They may be extended
4: NAPs will include the automatic promise, that you will not allow others to (ab)use this agreement to attack the NAP partner from your lands. Say France NAPs Spain, but allows ally Germany to attack Spain through French lands.
Some other ideas for the next game I personally have:
5: A game on the historical map with country selection. Players choose the country that they feel is best suited to their abilities. First come first go.
6: A game where rockets and nukes are forbidden (rocket fighters are fine if you want to research them).
RogodeterSnowl wrote:
I have to say I quite like the idea of published alliances and NAP's