THIS THREAD WILL BE LIMITED TO DISCUSSING COALITIONS IN THE PLAYERS LEAGUE
Should we use coaltiions or no
Coalitions, share map and right of a way were restricted to stop wolfpacking or at least to make it more difficult. If the coalition are restricted, I would like to restrict trade armies, resources and provinces, so players would be forced to play on their own. All trades to go trough market
I think it makes for different types of game play when there are coalitions and when there aren't. The players face different challenges in each of these type games. Personally, I find the non-coalitions games more interesting because the two strongest coalitions can often wipe out most of the other players.
A strong coalition can often wipe out a lot of players because they can coordinate attacks and cross each others territory.
The post was edited 1 time, last by haidang2014 ().
I would prefer a game without a coalition, but is there any idea to look after it?
On the last map 4 players directly or indirectly played together and won in this way. If such a thing does not limit it, coalitions and the prohibition of any non-coalition agreements will be more reasonable