So I'm trying to remember what solid fuel rocket interceptors were the allies working on during WWII but I cant quite find one, ah yes that's because there were none only the axis had them so what gives? Were having nonexistent units on the list, I mean there must be stuff the allies were working on that the other side did not develop.
Rocket interceptors
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
there were some rocket fighters by the allies but not to the same extent as the germans. They need them to stop B-17 bombing germany, the other nations really didn't need them. However it would be unfair to not give the other nation rocket fighters.
A Grumman TBF torpedo bomber taking off with the aid of 330 horsepower jet-assisted unit in about half the normal run.
and as for the russians to didn't really need them but still made them
Bereznyak-Isayev-1The BI-1
-
I'm trying to find when the Germans used panzer regiments made up of Maus tanks? Oh thats right, it never bloody got finished!
I'm trying to think of when the Germans had a nuclear battleship- I guess that damn H Plan got finished in secret!
Also, I'm really racking my head trying to think of when the Soviet union fielded the Kirov II-Class missile cruiser during the second world war- guess I just need to do more research on the topic.
Now, this game used experimental weapons and units neither side managed to field in great amounts, this due to the how development of weapons was between the Allied and Axis powers. You can be assured such weapon existed, however few would have seen combat. The devs try to make do with what they can, stop picking the game apart."If the tanks succeed, then victory follows."- H.Guderian
"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)" Admiral Jackie Fisher
"The 3 Requisites for Success – Ruthless, Relentless, Remorseless(The 3 R's)" Admiral Fisher
Crates: a Term used to define any unwanted and unneeded feature in CoW
Game Username: LordStark01 -
Nice one Tankbuster.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
TankBuster wrote:
The devs try to make do with what they can, stop picking the game apart.
-
Weird way of presenting it then, OP. Suggest varied units and such outright, not what you did cynically and non-constructively"A knight cannot save the world. They call certain methods of fighting good and others evil, acting as if there were some nobility to the battlefield."
"Honor? Glory? There's no point in speaking to a killer who indulges in such nonsense."
"It's a crime we call victory, paid for by the pain of the defeated" -
Besides the point though, I am down for faction-specific units, but keep in mind that this is a simulation of history that can be taken any direction. You could end up fielding swathes of rocket interceptors as Turkey even, if that's the way the cookie crumbles. So it is not really wrong it being the way it is, as this just sets a context and you are free to interpret it as the situation moves one"A knight cannot save the world. They call certain methods of fighting good and others evil, acting as if there were some nobility to the battlefield."
"Honor? Glory? There's no point in speaking to a killer who indulges in such nonsense."
"It's a crime we call victory, paid for by the pain of the defeated" -
The idea is terrible then. Some countries would absolutely suck.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Not really since we don't have to stick to "real" historical units as so many pointed out you could find specific unique units and I do not suggest that all units are different just a few. s.a rocket fighters for axis, maybe Katusha arti for soviets and so on, idea is not to make one side weaker just different, and I apologize if my tone sounded cynical to some of you.
-
Literally everybody had rocket arty...
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
But not on the same scale as Ivan
-
Ehm, no. The Germans used it an awful lot and I believe the others had landing craft with rockets and stuff like the Sherman Calliope.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
-
Don't forget the rockets they would stick on planes for ground assault and the Natter.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
I believe the RAF Hurricane used rockets during its final few variations."If the tanks succeed, then victory follows."- H.Guderian
"Hit first ! Hit hard ! Keep on hitting ! ! (The 3 H's)" Admiral Jackie Fisher
"The 3 Requisites for Success – Ruthless, Relentless, Remorseless(The 3 R's)" Admiral Fisher
Crates: a Term used to define any unwanted and unneeded feature in CoW
Game Username: LordStark01 -
A hurribomber was created to make use of the obsolete fighter aircraft. They were then shipped to the Soviet Union once the RAF had the Typhoon fighter bomber ready.British=best. Duh!
-
I think some of the carrier aircraft like the Firefly could mount rockets.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
Any attack aircraft with sufficient hardpoints could mount rockets.British=best. Duh!
-
Yes.
Forum ArmyField Marshall
Mess with the Bill, you get the scorn!
-
quiBritish=best. Duh!
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0