Artillery, medium/ heavy bombers, rail guns, and submarines should do more damage to naval ships.
Game after game I loose hundreds of medium and heavy bombers, subs, and artillery units to naval floatilla's. There has also been times I have lost dozens of medium and heavy bombers try to sink one battleship or one destroyer.
Think back to WW2 when the Royal Navy had supremacy over the oceans. There where countless times they were humiliated by air power dominating their modern navy and in most cases they would even stay away from the occupied European coasts because of the German artillery positions stationed along the Atlantic wall.
There was the time they lost two great ships (HMS Prince of Whales and the HMS Repulse) to Japanese bombers on their way to Malaya showing first hand air is superior vs naval units.
There was also the fiasco of re supplying Malta with operation Pedestal where countless bombers and submarines attacked and sank close to a dozen merchant and naval escort ships.
Also who could forget Pearl Harbor, when medium bombers destroyed the United States Pacific fleet? Small aircraft taking advantage of an entire fleet at dock and doing more damage to the naval units over the air units.
Air power was proven to be more affective vs naval units time and time again in WW2 especially in the Pacific theater of war. So why am I loosing my entire airforce to single ships? I research the bombers to their fullest but this seems to make no difference.
I think this should be updated to reflect this fact that air units are more effective vs naval ships and naval ships are not so effective vs air units.
Thank you for your time!
Game after game I loose hundreds of medium and heavy bombers, subs, and artillery units to naval floatilla's. There has also been times I have lost dozens of medium and heavy bombers try to sink one battleship or one destroyer.
Think back to WW2 when the Royal Navy had supremacy over the oceans. There where countless times they were humiliated by air power dominating their modern navy and in most cases they would even stay away from the occupied European coasts because of the German artillery positions stationed along the Atlantic wall.
There was the time they lost two great ships (HMS Prince of Whales and the HMS Repulse) to Japanese bombers on their way to Malaya showing first hand air is superior vs naval units.
There was also the fiasco of re supplying Malta with operation Pedestal where countless bombers and submarines attacked and sank close to a dozen merchant and naval escort ships.
Also who could forget Pearl Harbor, when medium bombers destroyed the United States Pacific fleet? Small aircraft taking advantage of an entire fleet at dock and doing more damage to the naval units over the air units.
Air power was proven to be more affective vs naval units time and time again in WW2 especially in the Pacific theater of war. So why am I loosing my entire airforce to single ships? I research the bombers to their fullest but this seems to make no difference.
I think this should be updated to reflect this fact that air units are more effective vs naval ships and naval ships are not so effective vs air units.
Thank you for your time!
