I think this is a bit advanced for the game's current state but YESH

Edit: state not states

Yes, I like it.

And certain decisions (like prisoning enemy civilians like American Japanese internment calms) and lower morale

I agree. I want to play a game where I can take POWs and release them when the war is over.

Also maybe add an option to increase/decrease the autonomy in non-core provinces

I like the idea about hostages, where if the opposing side pays ransom, the ransomed troops spawn at the capital of the country at 50% health. Rationing food and ideology also sound good, but I doubt the devs'll be implementing either of them, they're just too busy with their absurd projects (implementing new troop models instead of removing the trade restrictions for example).

I like the idea of hostages but it has been suggested many times but all denied...I sounds like hours of coding but... Why not? All I am worried about is another Call of War 1.5...I like the idea but I am not sure of others

They could at least try this for frontline games

I wonder why they never put this in beta.

yEaH

I very much agree with the idea ... even add topics such as political opinion of the country, (make a little more similar to HOI IV, those who have played it will understand me), this would make the game much more entertaining and improve the role play.

The creation of puppet states too, an idea mentioned several times that one day I would love to see.

Diplomacy with the IA countries, form alliances with them or even that they take the initiative by attacking another IA country or players, for a change.

The game still has a lot of ability to improve, and as someone who has played it for so long, I feel quite disappointed with its slow development.

Consider the "Universe" this game is set in, and the time. WWII. How much, truly... how much difference was there between the "Types" of governments when it came to WAR.

You had 5 Major powers with a leader, giving orders on killing each other. They ALL took prisoners, they all researched, they all failed to protect the civilian populations. Granted, some more than others, but are those differences truly so significant that it would affect game play?

-How do you "Set a Governing Style" that would reflect USA having 40% of the Worlds manufacturing capacity at start of the war?
-How do you counterbalance kamikaze units?
-What would be the counterbalance for the USA's development of Nuclear power when they used German scientists to make those discoveries? Right now that is solved by limiting RM's and ANY nation can direct its own Technology Path.

In the Big Picture, it was allocation of resources and Diplomacy that won/lost the day. Those main factors are quite well represented.

There were no stands taken "During" WWII which changed any one government's performance or abilities during WWII which are not currently covered by Diplomacy and Research.

I'm not sure how you could change that and keep it balanced.

i totally agree , i suggest that this game becomes hoi4 (free ) , events decisions , war economy diplomacy , maps everything .

Wats that? Reviving 2019 posts?