blue44elephant wrote:
Just because you play call of duty doesn't mean you become an expert in guns and ballistics. I had to spend hundreds of hours in the field getting experience with them so don't teach me and shut up and read the next line with your damned eyes OPEN: Artillery DEPENDS ON SHRAPNEL to kill. Not the big goddamn it explosions! UNDERSTOOD????????? If not then better go on google and see how artillery works and don't check wikipedia as it's edited by some fool who thinks he knows better after playing call of duty.Chimere wrote:
I don’t think you did much research yourself, beyond pop-history. Artillery weaker vs infantry than rocket artillery makes senseblue44elephant wrote:
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????I am a bit disappointed at that because I used to think you guys used to do the research.freezy wrote:
Artillery got weaker vs. unarmored but stronger vs. heavy armored, compared to their previous stats.
Having hundred of hours in the field as a grunt does not make you an expert in "ballistics". In guns, maybe. In WW2 artillery ? Not at all.