necroing thread.
just started playing CoN two days ago. never played CoW but the game seems too easy. Its unrealistic and requires(seemingly) less strategy.
Everyone complaining about resources and what not in CoN either don't know how to play or... nvm ur just trash lmfao
The reason annexing a city is expensive is bc its realistic and the dev wants to prevent the gamer from becoming a rush simulator. Im guessing the majority of people who play CoW have never played total war/civilization or just suck at either.
Also I don't see how the graphics in CoN is worse than CoW. I've seen gameplay and CoW has a basic world map with solid colors. there r multiple map view options if u have trouble using ur eyes in CoN. ive also noticed that most competent players is CoN say CoW is too easy and it clearly is for them. CoW seems to be a game based around aconomy where u conquer and somehow get 100% production out of an occupied city which is not realistic at all. c
just started playing CoN two days ago. never played CoW but the game seems too easy. Its unrealistic and requires(seemingly) less strategy.
Everyone complaining about resources and what not in CoN either don't know how to play or... nvm ur just trash lmfao
The reason annexing a city is expensive is bc its realistic and the dev wants to prevent the gamer from becoming a rush simulator. Im guessing the majority of people who play CoW have never played total war/civilization or just suck at either.
Also I don't see how the graphics in CoN is worse than CoW. I've seen gameplay and CoW has a basic world map with solid colors. there r multiple map view options if u have trouble using ur eyes in CoN. ive also noticed that most competent players is CoN say CoW is too easy and it clearly is for them. CoW seems to be a game based around aconomy where u conquer and somehow get 100% production out of an occupied city which is not realistic at all. c