Ranking

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Ranking

      I make a suggestion about the ranking. There should be a limit on the number of people with the patent, but when it comes to high-ranking officers. For example, an army marshal could only have one. And so for him to maintain his position, he has to make a monthly score higher than what is placed in second place. Thus, whoever gets first in the ranking, he cannot say that he has zeroed the game, or he has no reason to play because he has already reached the goal. But there is a challenge to stay on top!

    • El Cazador wrote:

      <p>I make a suggestion about the ranking. There should be a limit on the number of people with the patent, but when it comes to high-ranking officers. For example, an army marshal could only have one. And so for him to maintain his position, he has to make a monthly score higher than what is placed in second place. Thus, whoever gets first in the ranking, he cannot say that he has zeroed the game, or he has no reason to play because he has already reached the goal. But there is a challenge to stay on top!</p>
      The goal of the game isn't to get a high rank. The goal of the game is to win each round. The stat page is just to give other players an idea of who they're going up against.

    • El Cazador wrote:

      But all games are like friends. No game has the objective of rising in the ranking.
      CoW especially doesn't even entertain the goal of rising the ranking. There's no leaderboard. You can compare your own stats to someone else's but only on an individual person to person level. In some games you can work hard to be in the #1 spot but CoW has no #1 spot, and no one really cares. The levels/ranks are just supposed to give people an indication of how much experience you have playing the game. Making it all wonky about how many people can occupy a certain level defeats the point of that and makes it about actual skill, which is already inferrable from the K/D and W/L stats.

    • There is no competition ranking ok? it is just to show who's the most experienced player in the game and the lvl or rank shows you how much experienced you are going up against. AGAIN it is not a competition ranking it is just for people to know what lvl you are at and that lvl reflects on how experienced you are to the game. And Whats The deal with taking it out? does it bother your gaming experience? Like What does it have to do on your game?

    • El Cazador wrote:

      <pre>Because there is no competition, there is no reason to have it!</pre>
      The reason to have it is so that people can know how long you've been playing and how much experience you have in the game. Not everything has to be a competition. Sometimes it's nice just to admire how much experience someone has in this game we love.