Which is more preferable between the two?
Heavy Tanks - Consistent stat values, can be used for offense and has good armor. Expensive to make and slow.
Tank Destroyers - Good defensive stats against tank, not ideal for attack and has light armor. Cheaper to make and faster but vulnerable to infantry units.
I am making an overhaul to my doctrine because
1. I use too much units in my stacks and it is far wasteful to both resources and time to make.
2. I want to simplify my build.
What do you think guys?
Heavy Tanks - Consistent stat values, can be used for offense and has good armor. Expensive to make and slow.
Tank Destroyers - Good defensive stats against tank, not ideal for attack and has light armor. Cheaper to make and faster but vulnerable to infantry units.
I am making an overhaul to my doctrine because
1. I use too much units in my stacks and it is far wasteful to both resources and time to make.
2. I want to simplify my build.
What do you think guys?
"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."
- Sun Tzu
"Diplomacy works with leverage!"
-Krieg Maker
"We can wage an attrition war forever with no goal, if one is found otherwise!"
-Krieg Maker
"The difference between flirting and diplomacy is that the former requires flattery, the latter requires assurance. Be sure to be in the position of power when trying to win through diplomacy!"
-Krieg Maker
- Sun Tzu
"Diplomacy works with leverage!"
-Krieg Maker
"We can wage an attrition war forever with no goal, if one is found otherwise!"
-Krieg Maker
"The difference between flirting and diplomacy is that the former requires flattery, the latter requires assurance. Be sure to be in the position of power when trying to win through diplomacy!"
-Krieg Maker