Well does pan-asian not have an economic bonus in the way by which the units have bonuses? Surely if you use foot artillery and foot infantry instead of SP arties and mech infantry it is cheaper?
Why Pan-Asian is the only doctrine without a built in solution to its handicap.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Yeah it's cheaper, they are cheap because they are basic units but they can't compete with an Axis or Allies SP artillery or mechanized infantry.BMfox
Moderator
EN Community Support | Bytro Gmbh
Check out my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/BMfoxCallofWar
Found a bug or need help? Send a ticket here! -
Well Pan-asian foot infantry (apart from the HP) deals a ton of damage when in forest/jungle at max level. I don't remember the numbers in particular but three of them could probably take out 2 axis mot infantry.
-
Ah yes as said previously in this thread:
whowh wrote:
The terrain is incredibly useful! Put a pan-asian elite infantry unit in the forest and it deals 28 damage defending against infantry and costs much less than a german mot infantry unit
-
Mot. infantry should not be used against Infatry, mot. infantry is good vs AT', AA's and unprotected towed artillery and rocketsthrower. It can be used vs militia, and outleveled infantry, not against superior by level infantry or even equal one.
Mot. Infatry is expencive toy, speed unit with destealth ability, not really worth to use, because of more efficient alternative.
Only for tankrushers "could have"-unit.
Back to topic. Threadopener is wrong.
Pan. Asia has enough units with anti-handicap buffs.
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest