vote to end game in 100 person match

I firmly support 5, because if an alliance is playing, there have to be at least a few people who are still in.

For me 3 is perfectly fine. Higher numbers encourage forming big alliances, not in my interest .

can we make a poll on this?

I think another idea it will be to make a pool when a new game start... who ask how many players wants to be to finish the map... or befor start the game ... imediately after chose country to show that pool to vote ...

that will not be a realistic option, IMO, because the devs have to implement it in a standard way.

Correct. Nice suggestion though.

yup

I have an idea- why don't we all compromise and average the values? How about 6 people?

7,33

I was told it's as in the other scenarios: 1 player with the required VPs or the last 3 (or fewer) *active* players if all vote in the WH to retire the game.

well, it should be an easy fix to make it more. more would be justified seen the size of the map and number of players

yes, sounds like a good number

5 Sounds like a great number. 3 players is just too few on the 100 player map.

So it's bad planning that I wanted an army to fight my enemies?

I'm the largest player with about 600VP

I've maxed out every food province with lvl 5 forts and infrastructure/ICs, also the non-cores. Still have a huge deficit due to wars and having to maintain an army. You can't plan your way out of a war.

Obviously if you just sit around and build no army and don't expand there isn't an issue, but who would want that?

edit:
also have airbases throughout my territory and at least infrastructure lvl 2 or 3 on most non-core provinces.

wildL wrote:

_Pontus_ wrote:

There are no more capitals to be taken and still there is no food problem.

Many good players have stated so by now in the numerous threads concerning the so called 'food problem'.

CONLUSION:

There is no food problem.
There only is bad planning, resulting in bad developments.

So it's bad planning that I wanted an army to fight my enemies?
I'm the largest player with about 600VP

I've maxed out every food province with lvl 5 forts and infrastructure/ICs, also the non-cores. Still have a huge deficit due to wars and having to maintain an army. You can't plan your way out of a war.

Obviously if you just sit around and build no army and don't expand there isn't an issue, but who would want that?

edit:
also have airbases throughout my territory and at least infrastructure lvl 2 or 3 on most non-core provinces.

Largely irrelevant, but what player are you?

yeah, is still... because you cannot let you Baracks active, you cannot make a big army, and you cannot make Infantery troop, I dont talk with Baracks lvl 3 to make Mec. infantery its just a dream with 700 province if you make just 1 Mec. Inf ... And yes ... a war without troops is war ?!

@purplepizza117
I'm North Mexico and will never play as that country again.

wildL wrote:

Obviously if you just sit around and build no army and don't expand there isn't an issue, but who would want that?

Is this what you mean by sitting around w/o an army and don't expand?: OBVIOUSLY I am Indochina (824 provs)
OBVIOUSLY I do have a large army to be able to fight with 5 enemies on 6 fronts on 3 continents
OBVIOUSLY I should have a food problem according to you....

BUT... obviously I don't. (positive on food: +1126/hr now, though this a temporary spike, which will go back to +100)

OBVIOUSLY you should therefore not have a food problem too, like so many others don't have it, i.e.: Purplepizza, Joneleth, Sabalkus etc.