Bruh. It’s me godofthegame germany
HWW Revamp
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
cl0xy wrote:
vietcong2005 wrote:
There should be more tanks for the Soviet Union. Much more. Soviets had at least 11k tanks at the beginning of operation barberossa. While, Germans only had around 3k tanks. Meanwhile, the Italian navy wasn't outdated it was in fact advanced and modern. It was only bad because the lack of sufficient oil and resources. I agree that Japan needs a larger navy and more planes. It needs more medium levels naval bombers and level 2 or 3 carriers.
-
the Soviet Union was horrible in 1940 and very innefectice
-
They still beat the Japanese at battle of khalkhin gol
-
I would say that battle was a draw. The USSR and Mongolia outnumbered the Japanese 3:1 and had 30% more casualties.
-
no offence but everything you critiziced i disagree with. Maybe read more history first“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
its a known fact that the reason operation sealion didnt happen was because of Germanys Navy compared to Britain
-
vietcong2005 wrote:
cl0xy wrote:
vietcong2005 wrote:
There should be more tanks for the Soviet Union. Much more. Soviets had at least 11k tanks at the beginning of operation barberossa. While, Germans only had around 3k tanks. Meanwhile, the Italian navy wasn't outdated it was in fact advanced and modern. It was only bad because the lack of sufficient oil and resources. I agree that Japan needs a larger navy and more planes. It needs more medium levels naval bombers and level 2 or 3 carriers.
-
@GrandEmpire just explain why you think sealion didn't happen then.
-
Naval landings by themselves are a huge logistical challenge, Naval power and air superiority is a requirement and the Identification of suitable targets is a must for A decisive Advantage.
The premier naval powers USA and UK took years to prepare for the Normandy landings. Operation Sealion couldnt be accomplished by the germans as they didnt have the naval superiority, Air superiority, experience and technical knowledge for such an operation.
Besides the leader had already commited troops for Case Blue (drafted in 1940?).
whowh wrote:
I would say that battle was a draw. The USSR and Mongolia outnumbered the Japanese 3:1 and had 30% more casualties.
Case Blue had specifically stated Japan to not invade and keep them in the dark if possible so that the Japanese adopt the southern expansion policy and be able to supply its war machine.
Besides Japanese Diplomatic policy against USSR faltered after Germany Itself allied with USSR."In my humble opinion, on the subject matter, topic and content discussed beforehand; I would like to humbly propose, convey my idea on the subject and remark; this, with the help of the afforementioned post" - Karl von Krass
"The Golden Spire is looking for members, Anyone with good sense of game mechanics and a discord account can apply"
Secretary of Nova0213 -
Karl von Krass wrote:
Naval landings by themselves are a huge logistical challenge, Naval power and air superiority is a requirement and the Identification of suitable targets is a must for A decisive Advantage.
The premier naval powers USA and UK took years to prepare for the Normandy landings. Operation Sealion couldnt be accomplished by the germans as they didnt have the naval superiority, Air superiority, experience and technical knowledge for such an operation.
Besides the leader had already commited troops for Case Blue (drafted in 1940?).
whowh wrote:
I would say that battle was a draw. The USSR and Mongolia outnumbered the Japanese 3:1 and had 30% more casualties.
Besides Japanese Diplomatic policy against USSR faltered after Germany Itself allied with USSR.
-
I think the Soviet Union should definitely have more units. It should have at least some medium tanks. Not necessarily higher levels units.
-
no whowh i meant the stuff people said my thread
Was wrong
About“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
Karl von Krass wrote:
Naval power and air superiority is a requirement
Karl von Krass wrote:
The battle ended With a more Soviet Casualties it is a Soviet victory
vietcong2005 wrote:
some would argue that even Italian tanks were better.
-
whowh wrote:
Karl von Krass wrote:
Naval power and air superiority is a requirement
Karl von Krass wrote:
The battle ended With a more Soviet Casualties it is a Soviet victory
vietcong2005 wrote:
some would argue that even Italian tanks were better.
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest
-
Similar Threads