sadly not anytime soon if they were gonna do this idea they probably would have done in the beginning of doctrines they most likely thought of this and did not do it for a reason but hey if this thread get enough popularity they could see it and implement it you never know
Doctrines of the Titans- the solution
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
6 doctrines would be more than enough.
Even 4 doctrines could be enough, if we get country specifical modifikators, like delayed research, more expencive research, speed delay of research, cost and speed delay of recruitment for small nations. -
your making it far more complicated than need be“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
Grand, France wasn't a titan during the war. German troops overran Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and France in six weeks. They signed an armistice, basically leaving Britain as the only allied power, since the US wasn't in the war back then.-Aritemis
The only time France wants us to go to war is when the German Army is sitting in Paris sipping coffee. -
THIS IS 1939 the french army was the STRONGEST at that time the Germans won in 1940 becaus eof pincer attack“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
Aritemis wrote:
Grand, France wasn't a titan during the war. German troops overran Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and France in six weeks. They signed an armistice, basically leaving Britain as the only allied power, since the US wasn't in the war back then.
"Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención" -
new unit models for the new doctrines would be very cool, i finally wouldn't have to use spitfires for usa
-
So if I get hold of all nukes in the world then fall off a cliff, does that mean that I am a world superpower?-Aritemis
The only time France wants us to go to war is when the German Army is sitting in Paris sipping coffee. -
Technically. Many countries used French weapons in their armaments and followed the French doctrine too. A notable example is Belgium.
-
Aritemis wrote:
So if I get hold of all nukes in the world then fall off a cliff, does that mean that I am a world superpower?
"Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención" -
GrandEmpire wrote:
your making it far more complicated than need be
-
I would also like to see a generalized doctrine, perhaps called "International," to serve as a "default" doctrine for lesser powers. Perhaps based on arms imports from other countries, or even just generic names such as "light tank," "improved light tank," etc.
-
There has never been a general doctrine before in World War II. Most countries received training and equipment from Japan, Germany, Italy, France, UK, or the USA.
-
exactly hence the six titans and six doctrines“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
vietcong2005 wrote:
There has never been a general doctrine before in World War II. Most countries received training and equipment from Japan, Germany, Italy, France, UK, or the USA.
Then there's Czeckoslovakia, itself, that had an impressive arms industry. What about Yugoslavia? Its armored battalions were split between French and Czech vehicles, with German and British fighters and Italian bombers.
An International doctrine to apply to countries that were such a mix would only serve to add more variation to the game, and deserves a place just as much as any of the "titan" doctrines. -
A "mixed" doctrine maybe? But then that doctrine would have no advantages and no disadvantages as it would be a mix of everything. So then would it also be called a "blank" doctrine as well?
-
whowh wrote:
A "mixed" doctrine maybe? But then that doctrine would have no advantages and no disadvantages as it would be a mix of everything. So then would it also be called a "blank" doctrine as well?
-
I think such a doctrine should just be called "international," with penalties against research (as the countries with this hypothetical doctrine generally didn't have fully mature arms industries to compete with the "titans") and increased unit cost (as they're more dependant on international arms dealing and the prices thereof, rather than local industries).
In exchange, they could get a Pan-asian-like bonus to terrain, cheaper upgrades (international arms dealers compete fiercely for contracts to service their existant equipment) and cheaper trade fees that allow players more elbow room to manage resource imports and exports on the global market. -
Axis - Power
Allies - Optimization
Comintern - Quantity
Pan Asian - Surprise
Pan French - Defense
Commonwealth - InnovastionPresident of The Forum.
(As elected October 2023).
Can be found on Call of War itself as "Zaktty". -
on what grounds would you give a French doctrine a defence bonus? I liked the resistance idea, even if strictly too early in 1939. So if you want to be strict to 1939 then the French defence was an utter disaster… Maginot line anyone?!
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0