jubjub bird wrote:
I think we all agree that people like Erecon are scummy but can we please chill out with the strings of multi-quotes
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
jubjub bird wrote:
I think we all agree that people like Erecon are scummy but can we please chill out with the strings of multi-quotes
Erecon wrote:
Nah its not scamming its your view dude.
K.Rokossovski wrote:
The sea is red. The fact that everyone else thinks it blue is just their personal opinion; it is quite obviously red.Erecon wrote:
Nah its not scamming its your view dude.
K.Rokossovski wrote:
You're kidding me? It is mauve.
K.Rokossovski wrote:
The sea is red. The fact that everyone else thinks it blue is just their personal opinion; it is quite obviously red.Erecon wrote:
Nah its not scamming its your view dude.
Erecon wrote:
So things become facts when 5 members of a forum have the same views? Maybe you should get a reality check?K.Rokossovski wrote:
The sea is red. The fact that everyone else thinks it blue is just their personal opinion; it is quite obviously red.Erecon wrote:
Nah its not scamming its your view dude.
Lady Aragosta wrote:
1. This is a war game, so people are going to use dirty tricks to win. It's part it and those who can't handle this should probably find a different game to play.
DxC wrote:
I disagree. Just because it's a war game doesn't mean we should accept "dirty tricks" as part of the game. Games have a community culture. It's up to the community to decide what that culture is. I do agree that the community is split on this topic which is unfortunate for those that like the game, but don't like certain aspects of the culture.Lady Aragosta wrote:
1. This is a war game, so people are going to use dirty tricks to win. It's part it and those who can't handle this should probably find a different game to play.
Brando Dilla wrote:
Which comes back to my suggestion: that the game should tell you what you're getting and what you're giving.
Erecon wrote:
As you can see it says it clearly
DxC wrote:
Obviously, the game should be designed to minimize unfair exploitation of their players, but it's ultimately up to the players how they decide to conduct themselves.Brando Dilla wrote:
Which comes back to my suggestion: that the game should tell you what you're getting and what you're giving.
Rachellreist wrote:
That is not what an incoming trade looks likeErecon wrote:
As you can see it says it clearly
Destructo the Great wrote:
I Even got scammed when I was a noob
Brando Dilla wrote:
Me too: I was playing as Egypt in 22p Clash and my neighbor Libya offers to trade my city Luxor for 5,000 money. He said "here's an extra city for you, I don't need it" when in reality he was taking my city and giving me 5,000. This was back in the days when you could give away core provinces. I accepted the trade and found out that he had indeed taken the city. I declared war on him and captured Luxor back before it could be of any use to him. We fought for about 3 ingame days. I was able to finish off Libya before getting steamrolled by Turkey.Destructo the Great wrote:
I Even got scammed when I was a noob