In my world at war game I am Belgin congo and have taken over about half of africa, and most of india. Im in coalition with mauritania and persia. there is another coalition with queens-land, japan and papa new ginea. Papa new guinea has not conquered any territories at all in the game, and i found out with spies that the only buildings in his citys are level 5 industries. I also scouted around the island with subs and papa new guinea only has infantry units, but queens land has lots of units stationed there, powerful ones like heavy tanks. I threaten to attack papa new ginea in newspaper but queens land says if anyone attacks them there will be "dire consiquences". I find it weird how he would want a country that has done absolutely nothing in his coalition. Can someone explain this?
I don't understand this player
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
Seeing as they have only high level industry they must be like the resource guy for the coalition. While they don’t make units or fight they give resources to their Allie’s so they can do the fighting. It’s a weird tactic but I guess it makes sense. Plus why would Queensland want an obvious future enemy near their land, with high level industries too?
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
Apart from a) chivalry and b) the 25% non-core resource production, why don't they just invade him
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
— Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
— Lord Kitchener, on tanks -
Could be a multi accounter
-
If they are in his coalition then with 4x the resources he’s probably giving them it. Any resources he keeps to himself he uses to build more industry.
Lord Crayfish wrote:
Apart from a) chivalry and b) the 25% non-core resource production, why don't they just invade him
Maybe they should report that, have it checked. Always a good idea to keep an eye out for multi accounter.
6thDragon wrote:
Could be a multi accounter
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
Hmm... smells like a multi accounter. I've heard of players using second accounts as "resource farms" and they would get 4x as much resources than if they simply invade the country. No harm in asking staff to investigate.“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito
-
The funny thing about this kind of multi-accounting is that it's (1) not very effective, and (2) easy to discover.
It's not very effective because the resource farm is wasting all of its manpower, because it's not producing any units. And then other players see that and report. I'm sure there are multi-accounters out there who look like real alliances. -
How to report a player doing this ?
Brando Dilla wrote:
Hmm... smells like a multi accounter. I've heard of players using second accounts as "resource farms" and they would get 4x as much resources than if they simply invade the country. No harm in asking staff to investigate.
-
You need to go to support, type that you’d like to report someone or something of that manner, say you need to talk to someone, and choose the department that handles these types of people (forgot which one but you may be able to tell by reading) and follow the steps they give you.
Mark Dethief wrote:
How to report a player doing this ?Brando Dilla wrote:
Hmm... smells like a multi accounter. I've heard of players using second accounts as "resource farms" and they would get 4x as much resources than if they simply invade the country. No harm in asking staff to investigate.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
Use the In-Game Bug Reports.
Mark Dethief wrote:
How to report a player doing this ?Brando Dilla wrote:
Hmm... smells like a multi accounter. I've heard of players using second accounts as "resource farms" and they would get 4x as much resources than if they simply invade the country. No harm in asking staff to investigate.
Do not disclose names of the alleged player(s) in this Forum, that is against the rules.“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito -
But he never mentioned or even discussed that he would do that…
Brando Dilla wrote:
Do not disclose names of the alleged player(s) in this Forum, that is against the rules.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
I know; I’m telling him so he knows in advance to not do that.
Carking the 6th wrote:
But he never mentioned or even discussed that he would do that…Brando Dilla wrote:
Do not disclose names of the alleged player(s) in this Forum, that is against the rules.
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito -
Ohh I see what you mean, that is understandable. It seemed as if you were coming after him for doing something that he hadn’t yet done, my bad.
Brando Dilla wrote:
I know; I’m telling him so he knows in advance to not do that.Carking the 6th wrote:
But he never mentioned or even discussed that he would do that…Brando Dilla wrote:
Do not disclose names of the alleged player(s) in this Forum, that is against the rules.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
It's OK mate
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito -
I would check alliance tags…. They maybe from same alliance and joined match together and that’s their strategy. Possibility… however even if same alliance tag, may also be a multi account user
-
That's called Wolfpacking.
ODA366 wrote:
I would check alliance tags…. They maybe from same alliance and joined match together and that’s their strategy. Possibility… however even if same alliance tag, may also be a multi account user
“A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito
-
Share