Pan-Asian air strategy

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • With Pan Asian, I usually go heavy on interceptors and tac bombers. You can use air to give cover to you ground pounders, scout ahead, and clear small stacks out of the way of an armored car rush. You can send larger ground units of your own after your enemies larger units.
    • 6thDragon wrote:

      With Pan Asian, I usually go heavy on interceptors and tac bombers. You can use air to give cover to you ground pounders, scout ahead, and clear small stacks out of the way of an armored car rush. You can send larger ground units of your own after your enemies larger units.
      Add attack bombers and that’s my strategy, except I like to eviscerate large stacks that’s don’t use AA while I’m at that.

      CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      6thDragon wrote:

      With Pan Asian, I usually go heavy on interceptors and tac bombers. You can use air to give cover to you ground pounders, scout ahead, and clear small stacks out of the way of an armored car rush. You can send larger ground units of your own after your enemies larger units.
      Add attack bombers and that’s my strategy, except I like to eviscerate large stacks that’s don’t use AA while I’m at that.
      Attack bombers are situational. Sometimes I’ll go with them late game. Pan Asian have regular arty that are more well rounded by doing more damage to unarmored units, therefore I build more of them than I do with other doctrines leaving less need for attack bombers to deal with tanks.

      I agree about naval bombers too. They are great, but I often associate those with a naval strategy.
    • 6thDragon wrote:

      Carking the 6th wrote:

      6thDragon wrote:

      With Pan Asian, I usually go heavy on interceptors and tac bombers. You can use air to give cover to you ground pounders, scout ahead, and clear small stacks out of the way of an armored car rush. You can send larger ground units of your own after your enemies larger units.
      Add attack bombers and that’s my strategy, except I like to eviscerate large stacks that’s don’t use AA while I’m at that.
      Attack bombers are situational. Sometimes I’ll go with them late game. Pan Asian have regular arty that are more well rounded by doing more damage to unarmored units, therefore I build more of them than I do with other doctrines leaving less need for attack bombers to deal with tanks.
      I agree about naval bombers too. They are great, but I often associate those with a naval strategy.
      Thing is the amount of armored units I’ve killed with air is insane. Many people try to rush with stacks of armor that get obliterated by stacks with attack bombers. It allows you to push the land units into their victory point while assuring that any attempt to flank is just deleted by air. As good as artillery and tanks can be, having to move them to wipe out units takes too long, and a lot of the time these units are armored and strong enough that you’ll need more than tactical bombers to destroy them.

      CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate
    • jubjub bird wrote:

      Often just interceptors and naval bombers. Interceptors to cover fast attacks and provide air superiority, naval bombers to cover coastlines as a navy replacement. I skip tacs and attacks and do that damage with ground units.
      Am playing a WaW as Korea where Japan attacks me on day 1. He thought it would be a good idea to send convoys to my shores without any naval protection. Needless to say, a few naval bombers dealt with it quite effectively....

      Does Pan-asian have any (air) buffs apart from interceptors?
      CHHHHHAAAARRGGGEEE!