Anyone else miss playing the Mediterranean campaign

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Anyone else miss playing the Mediterranean campaign

      1. or maybe even a pacific map with historical accuracy. I love the maps the way they are but I wouldn’t mind having a Mediterranean or pacific blitzkrieg like map. The current pacific map I like but a historical accurate one would be nice lol
      2. For example I love how they have the 1944 endgame option. Bytro really does have fantastic scenarios if you dig deep.
      3. I do remember the 1942 mediterránean map being an option. My question would be , was it not popular?
      4. Just lemme know guys. Curiosos to know what you guys think about these alternative map scenarios



      The Conqueror of Worlds

    • Zaktty wrote:

      More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.
      Imo the best way to do that is make games cost gold. Simple as that.

      this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

      I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).
      Have a blessed day <3

    • SamPGS_17 wrote:

      Zaktty wrote:

      More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.
      Imo the best way to do that is make games cost gold. Simple as that.
      this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

      I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).
      That would annoy way to many people. A large portion of the player base may just up and leave, and I wouldn’t blame them. It’s hard to make a profit in gold so you’d be stuck grinding it on the rather boring inactive maps for a very long time. Just wouldn’t work out.

      CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      SamPGS_17 wrote:

      Zaktty wrote:

      More historical maps would be good, but something needs to be done where some games require a higher rank so that more people stay active.
      Imo the best way to do that is make games cost gold. Simple as that.this would even make sense for bytro in terms of bringing money into the game! Nothing to lose here.

      I would say make like the home front and 22p map free, but the rest, which require higher levels, should cost gold. This will also incentive people to save gold, and might even decrease gold spending in games (because they want to use gold to get into games etc).
      That would annoy way to many people. A large portion of the player base may just up and leave, and I wouldn’t blame them. It’s hard to make a profit in gold so you’d be stuck grinding it on the rather boring inactive maps for a very long time. Just wouldn’t work out.
      Nope it’s not hard to make a profit in gold. All bytro has to do is make like, HWW cost 1k gold, Antarctica cost 2k, and dominion cost 3k, or something like that. Then they can slightly increase the gold rewards (by maybe 4k for the solo top reward on HWW, 10k on Antarctica etc or smth). 2k is not a lot of gold at all, you can get this easily through achievements, watching ads, winning games. It means players go on fewer maps but are more active - and may bring in more play time for bytro, more ads watched, and yes more gold bought using real cash.

      I would argue it’s very easy to make a profit in gold.
      Have a blessed day <3

    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      I really don’t know about this. Too many players would complain about the game becoming P2W and the player base would cause a lot of backlash.
      It’s not pay to win if it’s like 1k gold. It’s so easy to get gold, even if you come like solo 5th you get 1k gold ish. If ppl complain the more the better - I want the ones who go inactive all game NOT to join, they need to have an actual incentive to keep playing. Idk about you but imo it’s boring af to be 1 player vs 30 players-turned-AI
      Have a blessed day <3

    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      Who says they work just go inactive anyway? It happened as well in those 5k gold HWW’s I joined a couple times in the past.
      If it’s pay to join the majority of games, and the gold reward is more, people are less likely to go inactive for a couple of reasons:

      1. The people who would usually go inactive would run out of gold

      2. More incentive to win the game because you spent something on it so want something back.

      On games you have to pay for, it’s so much more likely people stay active. You just can’t really argue against this tbh, some ppl will go inactive yeah thats inevitable, we’re tryna stop the whole map going inactive, which is what happens at the moment unfortunately.

      you’re just wrong
      Have a blessed day <3

    • On games you have to pay for less people will play. There is no guarantee at all of this working, these is always the risk that it will cause another problem or just not work at all. A free to play game actually requiring premium currency would throw off many new players, I know I wouldn’t have ever gotten into this game if it was like that. The game is already focused on trying to get new players, and the turnover rate is quite high. Making it higher is not exactly the he best decision.

      CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      On games you have to pay for less people will play. There is no guarantee at all of this working, these is always the risk that it will cause another problem or just not work at all. A free to play game actually requiring premium currency would throw off many new players, I know I wouldn’t have ever gotten into this game if it was like that. The game is already focused on trying to get new players, and the turnover rate is quite high. Making it higher is not exactly the he best decision.
      It would prevent the high rates of players going inactive in open games. Ofc fewer people will play - that’s what I want! Games will still fill up, they’ll just have active rather than inactive players. It’s simple as that
      Have a blessed day <3

    • Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.
      “A battle fought without determination is a battle lost.” - Josip Broz Tito

    • I wouldn’t mind waiting tho. More map possibilities would only help attract more players. It’s true that too many players go inactive and that would require another solution itself. Which is why I have an alliance and pretty much only play Ava and internals now.

      the gold idea seems like a good one when I read it but like carking mentioned, it’s bad for business. So I don’t know lol
      The Conqueror of Worlds

    • Brando Dilla wrote:

      Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.
      I remember playing 1944 endgame during 1.5, maybe 2.0 once. I think it’s possible to at least bring that one back…

      CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate

    • Carking the 6th wrote:

      Brando Dilla wrote:

      Game modes like Mediterranean Theater and 1944 Endgame were removed back in the 1.0 era, which means that if Bytro was to reinstate them, the maps would have to be updated to 2.0 standards. This would take a lot of time and effort, and unless Bytro sees a reasonable benefit to devoting their time to make the maps playable, they won't do it.
      I remember playing 1944 endgame during 1.5, maybe 2.0 once. I think it’s possible to at least bring that one back…
      Endgame was def in 1.5, damn the memories...

      That's prolly my favourite gamemode, unfortunate its rarely used and is very inactive.
      Have an amazing rest of your day ^^

      "Everything is impermanent. The only thing that is permanent it impermanence itself."

      Need support? ---> Send a ticket here!

      dxter's CoW Battle Calculator ---> Use it here!

      :tumbleweed:

      o7

    • Jchicas the Great wrote:

      @TheZhukov
      Love that profile pic and name lol it goes hard. You’ve been playing for a while, right? Seen your name a few times back then
      Yeah, on and off for about 4 years

      I think I remember you but I'm not sure
      Glory to the Union!

      Glory to the Red Army!

      Glory to the Revolution!

      Marshal of the Forum High Command