what is it?
Best country at world at war?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
In my experience, Upper Volta, French Sudan, Goias, New England, Quebec, Tibet, and the Philippines have good records.
I may or may not be withholding valuable information on certain ones I prefer.Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
— Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
— Lord Kitchener, on tanks -
speak those information than delete them after 3 mins!"Hate, union, freedom, justice, equality, war, peace, violence, blood. It is but a perfect mixture on destiny and our lives. It is for the mass we trust and for the mass we contribute, or to selfishly to personal greed we follow, it is up to your choices on what mixture you want. My mixture is a bit of everything with madness and humility in it, the virtues will black and sinful, just like I per say." - Kaiser Luther Ernst Willienburg.
-
I experience a lot of players from North Argentina playing with massive success. Same with South Africa and Southwest Africa.
-
ok thanks
-
Yugoslavia is one of the better countries from my experience. Its resources at the province level are good and you can use the natural naval choke point to restrict access to the coast of your core. I like South Sudan for the same reasons.
-
My favorites are Alberta and Turkey. Alberta is for Fat Albert reasons, Turkey is because I always play it all the time, but also since it has a great position. You can easily spread to three continents, and I usually don’t have trouble being attacked by many fronts
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
Carking the 6th wrote:
Alberta is for Fat Albert reasons
Aeroplanes are interesting toys but of no military value.
— Marshal Foch
A pretty mechanical toy [...] the war will never be won by such machines.
— Lord Kitchener, on tanks -
I would say Burma or Indochina, mostly cause of the benefits of being able to see further, and the capability to expand north, west, or east. I also like South Africa because you just have to worry going up, and being attacked from your north!
-
Lord Crayfish wrote:
In my experience, Upper Volta, French Sudan, Goias, New England, Quebec, Tibet, and the Philippines have good records.
I may or may not be withholding valuable information on certain ones I prefer.
You get: nitro on discord.
I get: the secret information on these ideal countries.
Deal? -
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.
Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares). -
GingerParty84 wrote:
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.
Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares).
Also with that same combination as allies is California and North Sudan. Both have coastal core cities. North Sudan is nice because you and/or your allies can secure access to the Red Sea and using naval choke points, your coasts are clear. -
Germany is ironically good for just that reason. As long as you can survive with the players around you, you have a dense area to conquer land. After you finish Europe, you can storm the old world there or go to America easily.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
6thDragon wrote:
GingerParty84 wrote:
Another thing to consider and one of the most important in my opinion is your positioning on the map for morale purposes later in the game. For instance, Australia would never be ideal in my opinion because you have a huge distance to lose morale points from whenever expanding off the continent.
Yes, you can move your capital, but then you have to deal with the distance to capital penalty with your cores. In the later game, dealing with a -20 expansion penalty and -20 distance to capital is very punishing.
Anyways, love Turkey, Syria, Iraq, North Sudan and Nigeria as well as others in that area depending on my doctrine preference.
I also recently played as Illinois for the first time, which has the best rural resource generation for the Allies Doctrine in my opinion (2 goods and 2 rares).
Also with that same combination as allies is California and North Sudan. Both have coastal core cities. North Sudan is nice because you and/or your allies can secure access to the Red Sea and using naval choke points, your coasts are clear.
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest