This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
Carking the 6th wrote:
On the other hand, your armored cars get crushed by light tanks and tank destroyers stand no chance to motorized. Fast stacks of lights and motorized can rush around your country, avoid those slow tank destroyers and take out armored cars if needed.
Carking the 6th wrote:
Somewhat fast, rapid to produce, can damage everything a bit, combined with other stuff, works for me. I really don’t like tank destroyers. Artillery is better overall anyway.
Donk2.0 wrote:
There are several things better.Carking the 6th wrote:
Somewhat fast, rapid to produce, can damage everything a bit, combined with other stuff, works for me. I really don’t like tank destroyers. Artillery is better overall anyway.
Carking the 6th wrote:
?Donk2.0 wrote:
There are several things better.Carking the 6th wrote:
Somewhat fast, rapid to produce, can damage everything a bit, combined with other stuff, works for me. I really don’t like tank destroyers. Artillery is better overall anyway.
Donk2.0 wrote:
Several different strategies.Carking the 6th wrote:
?Donk2.0 wrote:
There are several things better.Carking the 6th wrote:
Somewhat fast, rapid to produce, can damage everything a bit, combined with other stuff, works for me. I really don’t like tank destroyers. Artillery is better overall anyway.
Carking the 6th wrote:
Better than what? Elaborate. What strategies?Donk2.0 wrote:
Several different strategies.Carking the 6th wrote:
?Donk2.0 wrote:
There are several things better.Carking the 6th wrote:
Somewhat fast, rapid to produce, can damage everything a bit, combined with other stuff, works for me. I really don’t like tank destroyers. Artillery is better overall anyway.
Carking the 6th wrote:
This is more about the uses of them and if they are overrated, nothing to do with spam… just like heavy tank spam, it can work. Like of course spamming all the counters to a unit work better than it! THINK DONK, THINK!
Carking the 6th wrote:
They have their uses, but are seen just like what you stated, even though the same could be said of all armored units.
_Pyth0n_ wrote:
Ye Car has a point. You shud use AT over TD if the main purpose is to fight MTs. TDs are like 60% effective against MTs IMO, whilst ATs are about 75% (just for comparison's sake)
6thDragon wrote:
But they have significant differences in mobility. If you’re playing against active opponents, mobility matters._Pyth0n_ wrote:
Ye Car has a point. You shud use AT over TD if the main purpose is to fight MTs. TDs are like 60% effective against MTs IMO, whilst ATs are about 75% (just for comparison's sake)
Carking the 6th wrote:
I think the big thing is that they produce fast and still move at a very similar speed to infantry. Most defensive situations they will get the job done. Any time else, you can just use AB and Arty.
1 Guest
