Why are aircraft carriers necessary?

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Nobodyx2 wrote:

      Bro are your cruisers at the bottom of the ocean? Why not use Cruisers to fend off air attacks, instead of aircraft carrier and interceptor?
      One Pan-Asian cruiser costs: 630 grain, 950 metal, 630 oil, 1.1k manpower and 1.4k money
      vs
      One Pan Asian Carrier costs: 650 grain, 1.3k metal, 650 oil, 1.2k manpower and 1.5k money
      One Pan Asian Interceptor costs: 500 goods, 500 oil, 760 rare materials, 860 manpower and 1.1k money

      Bro are you ready to spend so many resources?
      You wanna escort landing troops or you wanna do naval battle? I won't put my landing troops into battle navy vs airforce when they just sitting duck there and take damage.

      also cruiser only help on the sea, but carriers with airforce will help more to push deep into enemy territory

      The post was edited 1 time, last by svlk ().

    • Klusey wrote:

      svlk wrote:

      All coastline with Naval Bomber patrol on there, you can use Battleship to bombard that area when your troops disembark but defender will send Naval Bomber, so you will need fighter to take them down
      If you pack interceptors onto carriers you are limited in how many you can bring. There is no reason the enemy can't recall interceptors from other fronts and overwhelm you locally.
      If you manage to fit more interceptors on carriers than the enemy can fend off with their land-based interceptors, that's simply a bad or inactive enemy.
      only few people protect their coastline with interceptors, why? simply just because their place are in the front line with spearhead troops, but naval bomber's job is to protect coastline.

      also even when enemy can recall their fighters to coastline, it will take long time, because fighter short range, need many airstrip to refuelling.

    • Nobodyx2 wrote:

      Bro are your cruisers at the bottom of the ocean? Why not use Cruisers to fend off air attacks, instead of aircraft carrier and interceptor?
      One Pan-Asian cruiser costs: 630 grain, 950 metal, 630 oil, 1.1k manpower and 1.4k money
      vs
      One Pan Asian Carrier costs: 650 grain, 1.3k metal, 650 oil, 1.2k manpower and 1.5k money
      One Pan Asian Interceptor costs: 500 goods, 500 oil, 760 rare materials, 860 manpower and 1.1k money

      Bro are you ready to spend so many resources?
      the problem was the Interceptors were way more flexible, quick reaction in case of approaching threat and rapid intervention if needed. Ship are bit more awkward, they were also slower
      ꦮꦺꦱ꧀ꦲꦺꦴꦫꦲꦺꦴꦤꦺꦴꦱꦺꦁꦲꦶꦱꦺꦴꦢꦶꦭꦏꦺꦴꦤꦶ

      Normal Day in Call of War

      World at War Playthrough

    • svlk wrote:

      only few people protect their coastline with interceptors, why? simply just because their place are in the front line with spearhead troops, but naval bomber's job is to protect coastline.
      also even when enemy can recall their fighters to coastline, it will take long time, because fighter short range, need many airstrip to refuelling.
      Are you talking about a level 1 interceptor, or a decent atleast level 4?
      "Another thing that has escaped your notice, Gisgo, is even more amazing: that, although there are so many of them, there is not one among them called Gisgo."