I mean, do you even need them?
Why are aircraft carriers necessary?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Well, considering air units are the best units in the game, they can be pretty handy in certain situations. Personally I'd only ever use them with naval bombers to deal with enemy ships, thoughForum Gang Premier
you are a balls -
They absolutely are not necessary and are probably the least common naval unit
-
Bold claim lol
GreatbigHippo wrote:
Well, considering air units are the best units in the game
-
and yet it's true
Klusey wrote:
Bold claim lolGreatbigHippo wrote:
Well, considering air units are the best units in the game
Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls -
I'll give you this:
GreatbigHippo wrote:
and yet it's true
You can make the argument that aircraft are the best units in the game because interceptors make bombers obsolete and offer you absolute air superiority that is helpful for ground troops, thus making an aircraft the best unit in the game.
But when it comes to stuff like tactical and attack bombers, no chance. Ranged units are what win wars. -
You know just because your enemy is building interceptors doesn't mean you can't have them, right? And interceptors have a higher attack score than defense score. And they're incredibly cheap. And they're faster than bombers so they can shoot down enemy interceptors before your bombers even show up.
Klusey wrote:
I'll give you this:GreatbigHippo wrote:
and yet it's true
You can make the argument that aircraft are the best units in the game because interceptors make bombers obsolete and offer you absolute air superiority that is helpful for ground troops, thus making an aircraft the best unit in the game.
But when it comes to stuff like tactical and attack bombers, no chance. Ranged units are what win wars.
I'm truly perplexed by this argument, because it relies on an assumption that your enemy has interceptors and you for some reason ONLY built bombers but no interceptors.Forum Gang Premier
you are a balls -
If I build nothing but interceptors and you build a massive air force with two or three types of aircraft, I'll always SIGNIFICANTLY outnumber you in interceptors. If you build 30 bombers and 50 interceptors, I can make 80 interceptors for less resources and in less time. It also costs me a lot less research, so there's a greater chance some of your aircraft will be lacking in research.
GreatbigHippo wrote:
You know just because your enemy is building interceptors doesn't mean you can't have them, right? And interceptors have a higher attack score than defense score. And they're incredibly cheap. And they're faster than bombers so they can shoot down enemy interceptors before your bombers even show up.
I'm truly perplexed by this argument, because it relies on an assumption that your enemy has interceptors and you for some reason ONLY built bombers but no interceptors.
-
The topic was aircraft carriers...not interceptors.
Yes carriers are necessary. Try crossing the ocean to invade without air support. -
Been there, easily did it with just ships. I’ve won multiple free for all WaW maps and I have not used a carrier in one.
Nostroma wrote:
The topic was aircraft carriers...not interceptors.
Yes carriers are necessary. Try crossing the ocean to invade without air support.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
carrier makes your life easier
but it's up to you if you want a carrier"Hate, union, freedom, justice, equality, war, peace, violence, blood. It is but a perfect mixture on destiny and our lives. It is for the mass we trust and for the mass we contribute, or to selfishly to personal greed we follow, it is up to your choices on what mixture you want. My mixture is a bit of everything with madness and humility in it, the virtues will black and sinful, just like I per say." - Kaiser Luther Ernst Willienburg. -
I won 5 games in a row in the 22 player map using only light tanks, so clearly every other unit in the game sucks ass.
-
NUKE SPAM
Zazmio wrote:
I won 5 games in a row in the 22 player map using only light tanks, so clearly every other unit in the game sucks ass.
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
@Fox-Company
Zazmio wrote:
I won 5 games in a row in the 22 player map using only light tanks, so clearly every other unit in the game sucks ass.
A new protegeGlory to the Union!
Glory to the Red Army!
Glory to the Revolution!
Marshal of the Forum High Command -
a companion"Hate, union, freedom, justice, equality, war, peace, violence, blood. It is but a perfect mixture on destiny and our lives. It is for the mass we trust and for the mass we contribute, or to selfishly to personal greed we follow, it is up to your choices on what mixture you want. My mixture is a bit of everything with madness and humility in it, the virtues will black and sinful, just like I per say." - Kaiser Luther Ernst Willienburg.
-
Thanks for info
-
Aircraft Carriers are just a tool to extend aircraft capability so if you using carrier you're actually playing an aircraft not a ship, i mean yes carriers aren't the best but it's not useless either.
-
An ally
CarKing the 6th of the Abrahamic Caliphate -
and aircraft are the best units you can build, so Aircraft carriers are goodForum Gang Premier
you are a balls
