Who cares about Aircraft carriers? Boooooring(If aircraft carriers do get implemented a submarine aircraft carrier capable of holding 2-3 naval bombers should be made available in the secret research branch) I want to seethe Russian Flying tanks! Or maybe Tankettes! Those are pretty big right? Minefields! Or the mother of them all the P1000 Ratte.
Secret blueprints
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
I think I want this, but will be happy to get what I need to move troops around quickly.
-
Oh, good morning! I see a lot of faces that have been into hiding some time. Nice to see you I see a lot of neat ideas here, just saying:
we are having a sketchbook with ideas for further units already, and we think to maybe establish a corner were we can present ideas from the devs.
TS -
Carriers I get. Coastal fortresses? That I don't get. We have forts and we have rail guns and we have 2 kinds of artillery. If you can't build the atlantic wall will all those, something is very wrong.
-
<p>Hi, units which i realy miss in game.</p><p><br></p><p>Aircraft carrier.</p><p>Paratroopers.</p><p>Marines.</p><p>Field artillery, in game its just hevy and sp.</p><p>Guys or armors with flamethrower.</p><p>Rocket artilery ( katyusa as sp, nebelwerfer 42 like slug).</p><p>Armored Train.</p><p><br></p><p>And province upgrade.</p><p><br></p><p>Coast guard. </p><p>Fun zone to increase morale of province and faster resuplly units.</p><p>Police staion, can help spy in contrainteligence and bit increase morale</p><p><br></p><p>Real rail way.</p><p>I thing infrastructure 3 its railway, but why that increase speed of 50%, any unit in train, move with same speed like train, in that case armor cant be faster like infantry or artillery.</p><p>I thing building like train station lvl. 1-5 give you possibilities to conection with other province. In train station you can give troops to train, with some time, after that can travel. Or you can build train parts or armored train parts, and need normal coach like place for troops. </p><p><br></p>
-
comrade dave wrote:
I returned to see what everyone else thought about this. END MY PAIN AND RELEASE THE AIRCRAFT CARRIERS!
Forum Gang Divine Entity
Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time. -
Ellio_98 wrote:
Dave...is...is...that you! Your back!!! ...NOW GET BACK TO WORK CLAIMING SOULS FOR ME!
-
I am having visions of the massive hydra bomber from Captain America.Vengeance is in my heart, death in my hand,
Blood and revenge are hammering in my head.
_Titus Andronicus -
Johan van kepler wrote:
I am having visions of the massive hydra bomber form Captain America.
"You have enemies? Good. That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life" -Winston Churchill
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"
-Napoleon Bonaparte
"Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the Bible says love your enemy"
-Frank Sinatra
"The last man who attacked me lived a half-life, so comrade come at me"
-ERB Putin
Your friendly neighborhood War enthusiast,
CrimsonKing -
"these new units must be huge, not to say of an enormous size."
This would lead me to believe that the new unit/units aren't necessarily huge size wise, but huge as in possible game changers. There isn't much military tech from the WW2 era that is relatively small in size but could have a major impact that isn't already incorporated into the game. The only thing I can think of would be some type of amphibious unit.
As it stands if you try to do some type of amphibious landing on enemy land it takes 4 1/2 to disembark. That is way too long. In real life it took an hour or less depending on how close the transport ship could get to the shore and what type of landing craft was being used. -
Would love to see Aircraft Carriers...Torpedo Bombers (1/2 effect tactical bombers vs land 2x verses ships)... Fighters should also be carrier capable... Destroyers should have double effect against submarines... Paratroops carried by tactical and strategic bombers (1 per tac 2 for strategic)... the ability to refit damaged units... the ability to upgrade existing units from 1-2-3 at some cost and time Radar to pick up planes and ships at distance
-
If the persons in the picture are representative of the possibility I'm inclined to go with landing craft. Carriers are not really associated with those persons.
-
trycster wrote:
If the persons in the picture are representative of the possibility I'm inclined to go with landing craft. Carriers are not really associated with those persons.
-
Could be your right
-
trycster wrote:
Could be your right
-
NP. I'm just throwing out my two cents and my reasoning. I would prefer carriers.
-
*catches the two cents* Carriers would be nice indeed.
-
I agree with aircraft carrier! We need a way to recon the open water. They could carry interceptors and maybe light naval bombers (lvl 1?) but would be limited as to the number of aircraft on-board.
-
RacingSpirit wrote:
Large units so must be Aircraft carrier
no limit to the level of units on board
Naval bombers, interceptors and
tac bombers that is all
no stat, nuclear, rocket fighter either
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
GUYS!!! I KNOW WHAT IT IS!!! ITS THE HELICARRIER FROM AVENGERS!!!"You have enemies? Good. That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life" -Winston Churchill
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake"
-Napoleon Bonaparte
"Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the Bible says love your enemy"
-Frank Sinatra
"The last man who attacked me lived a half-life, so comrade come at me"
-ERB Putin
Your friendly neighborhood War enthusiast,
CrimsonKing
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Similar Threads