Talvisota wrote:
Originally the book was written as an attack on Britain's appeasement at the time
I don't know if you've actually read Mein Kampf, but it is mostly a rambling book... everything is bad, and all needs to be "corrected". There's many wrongs identified, but the ideas on how to do something about it are pretty vague. All of THAT developed after they actually came to power, and again, there was much discussion on HOW to achieve the goals in Nazi circles. Goebbels and Himmler disagreed vehemently, for example. They all agreed that Germans/Aryans were superior beings, but they fought hard battles on HOW that supremacy should be exerted. The Holocaust wasn't even planned before 1941; but after Wannsee, it suddenly happened in two years. Surprise surprise, Hitler wasn't present at the Wannsee conference; it was just a bunch of people having a "technical" meeting on how to best execute his general guidelines. If they would have proposed to ship the Jews to Madagascar, Hitler would have likely been fine with it. It were the juniors (relatively speaking) who decided to kill them all instead.
Nazism was an ideology about goals, and not so much about actual implementation. If Germans could live their dream of superiority, they didn't really care how EXACTLY that dream could be made real; that was considered an "administrative" issue.
When the fake daddies are curtailed, we have failed. When their roller coaster tolerance is obliterated, their education funds are taken by Kazakhstani phishers, and their candy bars distributed between the Botswana youth gangs, we have succeeded.
- BIG DADDY.
- BIG DADDY.