Ranking / Insignia sucks

wildL SPQR · Feb 18th 2016, 10:47am

So... Hit level 80 and you become a "First Sergeant"? Hit level 70 and you're a "Technical Sergeant".

I don't want to be a Technical Sergeant or First Sergeant, or 50 other ranks of useless "Technicians" I want to be a Colonel or Major or something that actually show that I am in the top 10 rank.

I mean c'mon Bytro... Your ranking system sucks.

I suggest the last ten ranks are some form of high-level officer. Lvl 100 should be General of the Army or Field Marshall and have 5 stars.

nemuritor98 · Feb 18th 2016, 11:32am

Who said lvl 100 is the higher level?

wildL SPQR · Feb 18th 2016, 12:43pm

nemuritor98_ wrote:

Who said lvl 100 is the higher level?

Well.. No one is ranked higher than 100 right now.

nemuritor98 · Feb 18th 2016, 1:05pm

wildL wrote:

nemuritor98_ wrote:

Who said lvl 100 is the higher level?

Just because you're a member of the administrative team there is no reason to be a moron. In fact there is less of a reason and as an admin you're obliged to take members serious.

You're not funny.

#1 in ranking... and only called a "Master Sergeant":

He/She didn't hit the max level, so yeah, only called Master Sergeant.

wildL SPQR · Feb 18th 2016, 1:27pm

OK well... I refrain... Still think the levels are bogus.... why even have that many levels of the same, like 50 degrees of Sergeant...? What's the point?

In the real world a sergeant rank is a leader typically of a squad.. Hence there wouldn't be so many different levels. Stupid.

nemuritor98 · Feb 18th 2016, 1:34pm

wildL wrote:

OK well... I refrain... Still think the levels are bogus.... why even have that many levels of the same, like 50 degrees of Sergeant...? What's the point?

In the real world a sergeant rank is a leader typically of a squad.. Hence there wouldn't be so many different levels. Stupid.

I'll give you a point here, i also don't see the sense of having 50 ranks of sergeant but they made it with a purpose, hope a good one

i don't know which is the higher level plus i don't like the system used for ranks in-game but... as i said, i hope there's a good purpose that just bytro know

wildL SPQR · Feb 18th 2016, 1:34pm

Also the insignias are totally wrong.

In most armies sergeant ranks only have top insignia bars/lines and not a bottom insignia (only in some armies, and only designating chief rank)

TankBuster · Feb 18th 2016, 2:07pm

You would expect 100 to be well into the commissioned officer ranks such as major or something. RSM or WO1 may be better once you hit the level 50s, given this is the same company who made S1914, they could have borrowed ranking structure from there.

wildL SPQR · Feb 18th 2016, 2:19pm

Or they could make a rank system based on how many kills you have in each category:

Army ranks: Armor and Infantry
Navy: Obviously naval forces
Airforce: Obviously air branch
Special Forces: Anything from secret branch

This would also make the game more Military score-oriented instead of people prioritizing econ score.

The game is called Call of War, not Call of the Stock Exchange.

nemuritor98 · Feb 18th 2016, 2:52pm

wildL wrote:

Or they could make a rank system based on how many kills you have in each category:

Army ranks: Armor and Infantry
Navy: Obviously naval forces
Airforce: Obviously air branch
Special Forces: Anything from secret branch

This would also make the game more Military score-oriented instead of people prioritizing econ score.

That would be such a good idea.

Phoenix King · Feb 18th 2016, 4:22pm

I'd like to point out that though the rank is called "Master Sergeant," the rank insignia is that of a Second Lieutenant. At least that should be fixed.

Seroslav · Feb 19th 2016, 2:20pm

Bytro someway want to make the game look realistic with the troops and more.

Why not make ranks realistic too??

count marcus · Oct 31st 2017, 2:17am

Actually the ranking system models the US one of the time.

Share