Lets just move this to other thread
for now
trade routes...
for now
trade routes...
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
V1nd1cat0r wrote:
i think this idea adds realism but dosent complement the game system in place, IDK maybe were looking at it the wrong way?
anyway having routes to boost your economy is pretty handy given if you have a lot of territory at sea, but with the cost of actually protecting them and micromaneging subs which currently not very good not that bad, i think we should have a different function.
i suggest when the port is up and the routes are connected it provides vision, signifying your territory, like an aura of influence. that way when sepperated by large bodies of water the map visibility can prevent you from being blindsided, just imagine unimportant monitor ships passing by and was kind enought to report enemy activity.
sorry but thats all i got at the moment.
Quasi-duck wrote:
So your idea is that, if I build a port between Tunis and Rome, I'll have vision across that route due to trading convoys(which do nothing else) go between them? That sounds great.V1nd1cat0r wrote:
i think this idea adds realism but dosent complement the game system in place, IDK maybe were looking at it the wrong way?
anyway having routes to boost your economy is pretty handy given if you have a lot of territory at sea, but with the cost of actually protecting them and micromaneging subs which currently not very good not that bad, i think we should have a different function.
i suggest when the port is up and the routes are connected it provides vision, signifying your territory, like an aura of influence. that way when sepperated by large bodies of water the map visibility can prevent you from being blindsided, just imagine unimportant monitor ships passing by and was kind enought to report enemy activity.
sorry but thats all i got at the moment.
MihailMD wrote:
You have no idea about USSR , how it functioned and the reasons it broke apart
Quasi-duck wrote:
I'm sure you're an expert then.....MihailMD wrote:
You have no idea about USSR , how it functioned and the reasons it broke apart
MihailMD wrote:
So please keep you typical stereotype phrases to yourself as you have no clue what you are talking about.
Quasi-duck wrote:
Nope! #freespeechMihailMD wrote:
So please keep you typical stereotype phrases to yourself as you have no clue what you are talking about.
MihailMD wrote:
spamming it with useless comments and negativity
The post was edited 1 time, last by mio123 ().