oceanhawk wrote:
other than subs not fitting time line..
which they did..
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
oceanhawk wrote:
other than subs not fitting time line..
which they did..
Quasi-duck wrote:
Name where they sailed, where their pens wear and what the unit did. What area's produced them? Effectiveness in battle? Tell me that.
Quasi-duck wrote:
Name where they sailed, where their pens wear and what the unit did. What area's produced them? Effectiveness in battle? Tell me that.oceanhawk wrote:
other than subs not fitting time line..
which they did..
oceanhawk wrote:
Zulu class..
produced in Leningrad and in Severodvinsk
led to production of more variants.. and started the basis..
although early model could only carry 1 rocket..
Quasi-duck wrote:
That'll only get so far, as far as I know disagreeing and not liking another user are not against the rules.Pablo22510 wrote:
Respect, please. Otherwise, I'll report you both.
Pablo22510 wrote:
No, but insulting each other is.
Quasi-duck wrote:
As far as I know I did not outright insult him.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, but insulting each other is.
Pablo22510 wrote:
You kinda did.
Quasi-duck wrote:
I didn't think I did, OMG I am so sorry Ocean!Pablo22510 wrote:
You kinda did.
Pablo22510 wrote:
Was that sarcasm?
Quasi-duck wrote:
It most certainly was not!Pablo22510 wrote:
Was that sarcasm?
Quasi-duck wrote:
As far as I know I did not outright insult him.Pablo22510 wrote:
No, but insulting each other is.
Pablo22510 wrote:
Please stop it.
Quasi-duck wrote:
It's been dropped, I noticed your handiwork elsewhere thoughPablo22510 wrote:
Please stop it.
oceanhawk wrote:
you have made a lot of people in the forums happier
Quasi-duck wrote:
Your idea's are poor, I think they are unrealistic and would unbalance the game as well as skew research.oceanhawk wrote:
you have made a lot of people in the forums happier
oceanhawk wrote:
unrealistic?
you having a laugh?
oceanhawk wrote:
unbalance?.. not at all..
tell me how..
Quasi-duck wrote:
No, in WWII missiles were never launched from subs. Also, there is nothing that was ever called an "Ocean sentry", sounds more like and ego booster to me.oceanhawk wrote:
unrealistic?
you having a laugh?
Inflight refueling tankers? Giving NB, which already have a massive range, an even bigger one? Nuclear missile launching subs? You haven't even specified whether or not you have to load missiles on, are you planning on nuclear bombardment?oceanhawk wrote:
unbalance?.. not at all..
tell me how..
By the way, you're AEW aircraft sounds more like a spy plane with on-board radio-code-breaker-thingies, which would mean it has zero attacking and defending stats, yet you thought it should have attacking stats. It sounds more like a micro-unit in a macro game as well.
Also, the Ocean sentry is dumb. It is basically just a NavB with a bigger range and code-breaking equipment.
On top of all that, being able to see all the enemies plans with just a few crummy units is both really unfair and takes away most of the few advantages to using spies.
oceanhawk wrote:
Ocean sentry, just another name for naval patrol aircraft.. something with more range, carrier based and gives more intel on ship movement
oceanhawk wrote:
Missiles were fired from subs...
oceanhawk wrote:
I dont think I suggested any SSBN
oceanhawk wrote:
Nonsense, why would an AWACs aircraft have attack stats?
oceanhawk wrote:
it only gives a small bit more info, plus it is real time, rather than spies.