Best Capital for Europe

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Best Capital for Europe

      I'm running to Germany I captured all europe ( Spain England İtaly --- Finland Sweden Archangelsk North Ural Turkey Iraq ) you can imagine the picture

      My questions -

      Which city or Which area best for to be capital ?

      If I change my capital what will be my advantage ? my capital is berlin If I change it my production will release I think ??

      I have a supersitition When my units injured I need to pull back them to my capital If I pull back them to a city which have %100 moral does it have any difference from capital about increase moral ??

      and last question outside of topic I have a big food problem -1000 If you have all europe what would you produce ? tanks tanks tanks ?? only light tanks ?? I tried to produce mediums it seems unnecessary slow and it dies quickly light tanks need low food ? what do you think ?
    • depends where your troops are fighting..

      not to far from the front lines.. help keeps moral high after you take new territory..

      depends.. on the war situation..



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • Undaunted wrote:

      So you suggest carry capital to front line ?? for example I'm going to Iraq I have all europe so I should carry my capital to Turkey ??
      Don't move it to the front, if an in invasion goes badly you lose more than just a province, resources will go with it too.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Undaunted wrote:

      So you suggest carry capital to front line ?? for example I'm going to Iraq I have all europe so I should carry my capital to Turkey ??
      gosh no..
      if that falls..


      no just some people tend to carry it with them.. a good few provinces from the front for moral..

      I personal dont like this.. but many do..

      it increases moral in the new provinces..



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • You should try to keep your capital towards the front, but need forts behind you to keep morale up in the other regions you took.
      Carl Wilson

      “Dad, how do soldiers killing each other solve the world's problems?”
      ― Bill Watterson, Calvin and Hobbes: Sunday Pages 1985-1995: An Exhibition Catalogue

      "Rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, is: 'Do not march on Moscow'… Rule 2 is: 'Do not go fighting with your land armies in China."
      Bernard Law Montgomery, British general
    • Carl Wilson wrote:

      You should try to keep your capital towards the front, but need forts behind you to keep morale up in the other regions you took.
      moving the capital away from core provinces.. is bad for res production..

      moral will fall slightly there..
      and core provinces are important..

      having the capital on the front line is one bad idea..
      having forts with it, is of no use Im afraid..



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • I prefer to put my capital in the rough middle of my empire. Putting it towards the front is too risky, and most of the time keeping it in my core provinces will lower the morale in my outer provinces too much.
      Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
      -Winston Churchill

      Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
      -George S. Patton
    • Berlin, a perfect place for the German Empire.


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      think the best place for a European capital is around the Northern Italy-Yugoslavia area.
      Zagreb, perhaps?


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Forts are expensive, especially for entire fronts. Moving your capital is essential for larger empires.
      Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
      -Winston Churchill

      Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest, however tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. Keep punching.
      -George S. Patton
    • LordVoidVIII wrote:

      Keep it right where it is. Unless you have max forts on all your core resources then the morale deduction will outweigh any benefits of keeping newly captured provinces.
      Generally true, especially on the smaller 22-player European map. Trans-Atlantic invasions present challenges, however, because the distances from North America make stabilizing morale and preventing rebellions harder. I always stockpile additional metal for building fortresses whenever I am invading North America from Europe. Because most of the countries are on the eastern side of the Atlantic, it usually makes more sense to pick a European country rather than a North American one -- and I say that as someone who has won twice playing the Northern United States.


      Kehsct wrote:

      Forts are expensive, especially for entire fronts. Moving your capital is essential for larger empires.
      That certainly can be true, especially on the 100-player world map. I've managed to work around the distance-morale stabilization problem on the 50-player Pacific map by judicious use of fortresses and well-timed morale boosts from the capture of enemy capitals. Depending on where you start on the 100-player map, moving your capital may be the only way to stabilize the morale of newly captured provinces, but there is a serious price to be paid in lost resource production in your core provinces. As a fanatical resource-production maximizer, that drives me crazy. The distance-morale formula -- which was originally created for the 22-player map -- really needs to be adjusted for the larger maps. Stabilization of morale should be challenging, but never impossible.