Not having planes is very viable if you load up on AA and are disciplined with putting them in all their stacks.
About Railguns
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
RBoi200 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
-
vietcong2005 wrote:
RBoi200 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
-
Chimere wrote:
Not having planes is very viable if you load up on AA and are disciplined with putting them in all their stacks.
i basically destroy my enemy economy and he was unable to raise more troops to fight me."Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención" -
1. Don't use Strat bombers
2. Use tactical and attack bombers more. -
vietcong2005 wrote:
1. Don't use Strat bombers
2. Use tactical and attack bombers more.
"Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención"The post was edited 1 time, last by Danieliyoverde123 ().
-
Exactly. That's why I don't use them. I want to keep my buildings intact. Especially in 1.0 where you have to build an industrial complex.
-
Chimere wrote:
Not having planes is very viable if you load up on AA and are disciplined with putting them in all their stacks.
-
OldPotatoes wrote:
Chimere wrote:
Not having planes is very viable if you load up on AA and are disciplined with putting them in all their stacks.
-
Chimere wrote:
You can win in smaller maps (European maps) without planes too
-
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
I started playing this game again now after years of not doing so, and in one of my games everybody seems to have artillery. Yet back in the day artillery was useless, as far as I can recall. Isn't it just better to have planes?The past is a foreign country. -
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
I started playing this game again now after years of not doing so, and in one of my games everybody seems to have artillery. Yet back in the day artillery was useless, as far as I can recall. Isn't it just better to have planes?
-
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
I started playing this game again now after years of not doing so, and in one of my games everybody seems to have artillery. Yet back in the day artillery was useless, as far as I can recall. Isn't it just better to have planes?
I don't think artillery was ever useless though.The post was edited 1 time, last by Chimere ().
-
Chimere wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
-
Comrade genz wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
Chimere wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
On the other hand, I don't know how long you've been playing, Chimere, but let me assure you that back in 2016/2017 nobody produced artillery. It was useless.The past is a foreign country. -
@Pablo22510 : I actually started in 2017, and indeed back then tactical bombers killed everything (there was a nerf done within 1.0, before the 1.0 => 1.5 nerf) ; I don't quite remember if I used artillery back then - maybe against AI which was particularly static by then too.
-
Comrade genz wrote:
Chimere wrote:
Pablo22510 wrote:
whowh wrote:
I'm just laughing at the posts of everyone above. Nowadays not having arties is like posting in the newspaper "Everyone plz attack me!!!!!!!"
-
Yeah i didnt read any of that.
But Railguns for me are useful! They were the MAIN factor in my first solo win. Crushed the Chinese 3rd offensive with em.“I do not love the sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior. I love only that which they defend.”
“If you win, you need not explain!”
“What difference does it make if destruction is wrought under the name of dictators or in the name of democracy?”
War is Peace
Slavery is Freedom
Weakness is Strength -
On 1.5 matches every Unit could be useful.
The diferent armor types and units being a hard counter of specific armor makes every Unit useful in the right situation.
But 1.0 Is still the same after all these years, just go for Tac bombers lol"Si crees que esto tendrá un final feliz, es que no has estado prestando atención" -
This post is so full of noobs claiming bullshits.. now i understand why my K/D skyrocket from 3.5 to 5.. nowdays i meet ppl like you with no artillery and just a bunch of stupid units and same tacs. they loose all their troops without dealing a single damage on me. so yeah artillery is useless keep the bad play up
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0