Who would win?

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      Of course I have, what about it?
      The many tanks and soldiers that has Russia, it is easy to defeat them with simple strategy.


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      Yeah, guerilla warfare, which is what would happen to American troops in Siberia.
      The conditions of Siberia would prevent a guerrilla war.


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      Ehm, how?
      The constant bombardment and the lack of supply lines would be unable to create a guerrilla force.


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Caesar wrote:

      The constant bombardment and the lack of supply lines would be unable to create a guerrilla force.
      You do know even something as simple as digging a ditch will slow down the American forces? Besides, the bombing didn't work too well against Iraqi's and Afghan's, now did it?
      Forum Gang Commissar



      I changed it for you Dia <3
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      You do know even something as simple as digging a ditch will slow down the American forces? Besides, the bombing didn't work too well against Iraqi's and Afghan's, now did it?
      The weather would prevent the creation of trenches.

      Also, this thread need one poll, what do you think?


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      If it is too cold to dig the ground, then it will be too cold for US and UK forces to operate properly.
      Perhaps, but a landing in Siberia with support is a victory.


      "I came, I saw, I conquered" Written in a report to Rome 47 B.C., after conquering Pharnaces at Zela in Asia Minor in just five days; as quoted in Life of Caesar by Plutarch; reported to have been inscribed on one of the decorated wagons in the Pontic triumph, in Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Julius, by Suetonius.


      "Alea iacta est" Gaius Julius Caesar.
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      The Americans can supply their ammo
      Show me America's factories that produce ammo for the Challenger 2.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      They dont even have a central command
      Source?

      oceanhawk wrote:

      China ha, its a joke of an army.
      That is what Japan thought in WWII. They've only gotten stronger since.
      I havent even looked, but its not like they cant adapt


      They dont have a central command,

      globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)


      It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      They dont have a central command,

      globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)
      So, they run their army differently? That is what seems to be going on here.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.
      So you are saying the Chinese army is a fierce force thanks to the Americans? Well, it is more Western powers in general but so-so.
      Forum Gang Commissar



      I changed it for you Dia <3
    • Stalemate.

      • China actually spends twice as much on their military than publicly announced. Most of that money goes through other channels.
      • The US and UK navy would prevent Chinese or Russian troops from invading north America
      • If China and Russia made it to north America... well, watch Red Dawn.
      • Russia could cut of US supply lines from the middle east (US still has oil, though)
      • We all know what happens when winter hits an invading army in Russia. On top of that, the US army hasn't been in a conflict in a cold climate since Korea (as far as I know)
      • UK is not a weak nation, but Russia is more powerful. US would have to send troops to Europe to assist, but that would take away assets from the pacific.
      • Everybody would run out of money really fast because their all fighting their main trading partners.
      Forum Gang Premier :thumbsup:




      you are a balls
    • Jacey521 wrote:

      This is a thread meant to discuss people/nations/animals pitted against each other.

      First topic, who do you think would win in a war between US and UK vs Russia and China?

      Rules for this battle
      1. No nukes
      2. no other countries can help militarily in anyway
      3. They start with current resources, military, economy etc
      4. war is won whenever the other side surrenders
      It depends. Whoever is on the defensive wins.

      Quasi-duck wrote:

      Yes, but Russian aviation is quantity over quality. Quantity is a quality of its own.
      Look, I don't care how many MiG-31s and Su-24 they have, no one, absolutely no one, can beat a good pilot in an F-15.
      "You can't break a man the way you break a dog, or a horse. The harder you beat a man, the taller he stands." -Jackal (Far Cry 2)

    • Pablo22510 wrote:

      Look, I don't care how many MiG-31s and Su-24 they have, no one, absolutely no one, can beat a good pilot in an F-15.
      Except for like, I dunno, 50 MiG pilots?

      Pablo22510 wrote:

      It depends. Whoever is on the defensive wins.
      Russia cannot project power, China is building it's navy. So USUK are attacking.
      Forum Gang Commissar



      I changed it for you Dia <3
    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      They dont have a central command,

      globaltimes.cn/content/835937.shtml (state run media)
      So, they run their army differently? That is what seems to be going on here.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      It was a joke in WW2, Thks to the American's it became a fierce force.
      So you are saying the Chinese army is a fierce force thanks to the Americans? Well, it is more Western powers in general but so-so.
      Hahaha, yea see Id say that might make the chinease army a little inifecint



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • GreatbigHippo wrote:

      Stalemate.

      • China actually spends twice as much on their military than publicly announced. Most of that money goes through other channels.
      • The US and UK navy would prevent Chinese or Russian troops from invading north America
      • If China and Russia made it to north America... well, watch Red Dawn.
      • Russia could cut of US supply lines from the middle east (US still has oil, though)
      • We all know what happens when winter hits an invading army in Russia. On top of that, the US army hasn't been in a conflict in a cold climate since Korea (as far as I know)
      • UK is not a weak nation, but Russia is more powerful. US would have to send troops to Europe to assist, but that would take away assets from the pacific.
      • Everybody would run out of money really fast because their all fighting their main trading partners.

      I think today, America is on top of Russia, in another ten years, with the F-35s, Russia will rule the skies.

      Chinease forces, havent been deployed in mass, since 1989 in Tiananmen Square. And havent fought a war since Korea.
      They have no experience, and their generals are Communist party politicans, not even army men..
      Russia would be better off, nuking china, then carrying on with the war, China will just be a drag.

      Russia, will be pretty lethal do.

      UK isnt weak, no. Best marines and special forces around



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      Hahaha, yea see Id say that might make the chinease army a little inifecint
      Apparently not if they are pushing the US out of the South China.
      Not really. I dont actually think, the Chinease navy, have actually ever been in a naval battle



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      their generals are Communist party politicans, not even army men..
      The US armed forces has a lot of civvies in it.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      Russia would be better off, nuking china, then carrying on with the war, China will just be a drag.
      That is just moronic.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      UK isnt weak, no. Best marines and special forces around
      Point being? As of late, 3 SEALs were killed by two terrorists with a mortar.
      Forum Gang Commissar



      I changed it for you Dia <3