Who would win?

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Guys, new topic. The first has run its course. If not enough people comment on the new topic, I will create a new one. In fact, you guys can propose one, if you'd like.

      GreatbigHippo wrote:

      Can our actors have abilities from a movie that they were in?
      Hmm, no, because I know everyone will just choose Chuck Norris/some superhero and win easily. Your actors however, can use any knowledge they might've gained from working on a movie, show, or another other film/media/play.
      yo, what did the pirate say to the parrot? ... he said, ARRR you y- i'm a cracker..? ahem.. s-sorry.. i'm not.. uh.. very *good* with uh.. y'know jokes. I don't know .. um, yeah i guess i uh... will just give you a quote! yeah.. thats what i'll do.. a quote..

      ahem.. here's the quote:

      "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light." :00000450:

    • Jacey521 wrote:

      Your actors however, can use any knowledge they might've gained from working on a movie, show, or another other film/media/play.
      Can a actor of Peter Parker get bit by the mountain lion and gain its powers, since they know the trick to this from playing Spiderman?
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      US military project corruption, eh?
      Not corruption.

      Back in the 50s, planes had no MGs because they thought they only needed missiles. That was quickly disproven, as dogfights still occurred, and MGs were vital for close combat. This is a similar problem with what has happened with the F-35. They have tried making a heavily-armed fighter, kind of like an F-15, which can blast you out of the sky long before you can see it. However, the F-15 is one of the best planes in the world due to its manouvreablity and firepower. The F-35 doesn't have any manouvreability, and it loses its grip on the essence of plane combat: dogfighting. So in close combat, it is horrible.
      The past is a foreign country.

    • Pablo22510 wrote:

      Back in the 50s, planes had no MGs because they thought they only needed missiles. That was quickly disproven, as dogfights still occurred, and MGs were vital for close combat. This is a similar problem with what has happened with the F-35. They have tried making a heavily-armed fighter, kind of like an F-15, which can blast you out of the sky long before you can see it. However, the F-15 is one of the best planes in the world due to its manouvreablity and firepower. The F-35 doesn't have any manouvreability, and it loses its grip on the essence of plane combat: dogfighting. So in close combat, it is horrible.
      The F-35 has been a massive drain on government funds, because of corruption. The same thing happened with what was meant to be the new SPAAG of US forces. Ironically, it was too slow, just like the F-35.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      Pablo22510 wrote:

      Back in the 50s, planes had no MGs because they thought they only needed missiles. That was quickly disproven, as dogfights still occurred, and MGs were vital for close combat. This is a similar problem with what has happened with the F-35. They have tried making a heavily-armed fighter, kind of like an F-15, which can blast you out of the sky long before you can see it. However, the F-15 is one of the best planes in the world due to its manouvreablity and firepower. The F-35 doesn't have any manouvreability, and it loses its grip on the essence of plane combat: dogfighting. So in close combat, it is horrible.
      The F-35 has been a massive drain on government funds, because of corruption. The same thing happened with what was meant to be the new SPAAG of US forces. Ironically, it was too slow, just like the F-35.
      Nah, US government isn't corrupt.
      The past is a foreign country.

    • The F-35 is the reason, Russia will rule the skies in a few years. So many nations, have also gotten infected with this disease, at least the French and Germany's will keep European skies, somewhat protected.


      Another reason, why the F-35 is absolutly, stupid and awful, is because it is replacing the A-10(What a beast) in the role of ground support, the F-35 can only last about an hour If lucky, on combat patrol, compared to the A-10 which can last about 7 hours, on combat patrol,

      Another issue with the F-35, is get this for every one hour of flight, it needs 100 HOUR'S MAINTENANCE!
      The plane its self, cant even take in fuel that is "warm"
      The plane cant take Sidewinders, and because of it carrying the payload internally, it really has small load.

      Here is the Kicker, The Defense Department's annual weapons testing report reveals that the military actually adjusted the performance specifications for the consistently-underperforming line of F-35 fighter jets. In other words, they couldn't get the jets to do what they were supposed to do, so they just changed what they were supposed to do...

      The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35A, reducing turn performance from 5.3 to 4.6 sustained g’s and extending the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by eight seconds




      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      Pablo22510 wrote:

      Nah, US government isn't corrupt.
      It totally is.
      quora.com/What-is-the-best-pho…ion/answer/Jay-Bazzinotti
      Your right quasi, the private sector, should be doing that, so they risk their own money, and have to actually be sure this stuff doesnt happen. Dam government,,,



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      The F-35 is the reason, Russia will rule the skies in a few years. So many nations, have also gotten infected with this disease, at least the French and Germany's will keep European skies, somewhat protected.


      Another reason, why the F-35 is absolutly, stupid and awful, is because it is replacing the A-10(What a beast) in the role of ground support, the F-35 can only last about an hour If lucky, on combat patrol, compared to the A-10 which can last about 7 hours, on combat patrol,

      Another issue with the F-35, is get this for every one hour of flight, it needs 100 HOUR'S MAINTENANCE!
      The plane its self, cant even take in fuel that is "warm"
      The plane cant take Sidewinders, and because of it carrying the payload internally, it really has small load.

      Here is the Kicker, The Defense Department's annual weapons testing report reveals that the military actually adjusted the performance specifications for the consistently-underperforming line of F-35 fighter jets. In other words, they couldn't get the jets to do what they were supposed to do, so they just changed what they were supposed to do...

      The program announced an intention to change performance specifications for the F-35A, reducing turn performance from 5.3 to 4.6 sustained g’s and extending the time for acceleration from 0.8 Mach to 1.2 Mach by eight seconds
      The A-10 isn't being replaced. At least not yet. Some politicians proposed replacing it with the F-35, but then pretty much everybody said it was an awful idea, so they didn't.
      Forum Gang Premier

      you are a balls

    • GreatbigHippo wrote:

      The A-10 isn't being replaced. At least not yet. Some politicians proposed replacing it with the F-35, but then pretty much everybody said it was an awful idea, so they didn't.
      Yeah, people have wanted to replace the A-10 since it came out. TBH though it is totally overkill for popping Jimmy Jihad's CAS cherry. A P-51 with some cannons in external pods would do the job.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      GreatbigHippo wrote:

      The A-10 isn't being replaced. At least not yet. Some politicians proposed replacing it with the F-35, but then pretty much everybody said it was an awful idea, so they didn't.
      Yeah, people have wanted to replace the A-10 since it came out. TBH though it is totally overkill for popping Jimmy Jihad's CAS cherry. A P-51 with some cannons in external pods would do the job.
      I love the Warthog. Looks cool, is deadly, and is really OP.
      The past is a foreign country.

    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      GreatbigHippo wrote:

      The A-10 isn't being replaced. At least not yet. Some politicians proposed replacing it with the F-35, but then pretty much everybody said it was an awful idea, so they didn't.
      Yeah, people have wanted to replace the A-10 since it came out. TBH though it is totally overkill for popping Jimmy Jihad's CAS cherry. A P-51 with some cannons in external pods would do the job.
      Overkill is good. When you can win with M16's, give your troops M-61 Vulcans.
      Forum Gang Premier

      you are a balls

    • GreatbigHippo wrote:

      Overkill is good. When you can win with M16's, give your troops M-61 Vulcans.
      That isn't the point. Some US infrastructure is going to hell, with families on food stamps, and you're sending jets to do the job a 70 year old plane can do for cheap. Hell, a DC-3 with a 40mm Bofors in a blister would be fine.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      GreatbigHippo wrote:

      Overkill is good. When you can win with M16's, give your troops M-61 Vulcans.
      That isn't the point. Some US infrastructure is going to hell, with families on food stamps, and you're sending jets to do the job a 70 year old plane can do for cheap. Hell, a DC-3 with a 40mm Bofors in a blister would be fine.
      You're right, if more soldiers die there would be less unemployment because you'd have to hire people to replace them.
      Forum Gang Premier

      you are a balls