Pax Romana Communications Officer
Who will win the Pax Romana Zombie Challenge?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
I eat brains, therefore, I exist. - Rene Devourertes
-
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
If you're running from the zombies, we're firing you.Pax Romana Communications Officer
-
Well with a zombie apocalypse you only need to be able to run faster than the guy next to you
Forum Gang Divine Entity
Taking over the Forum 1 post at a time. -
If the militia + forts don't win, it's user error.
-
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
-
DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
Lol, newspapers saw my troops have killed ~8,000 troops to the loss of.... one.Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
Trump will win this, his walls are invincible.Estoy dispuesto a darlo todo, a luchar por lo que soy, a ser libre dentro de mi, a guerrear mientras viva.
Manual: Básico y Machiavelli
-
Quasi-duck wrote:
DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
-
DxC wrote:
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
DxC wrote:
Quasi-duck wrote:
DxC wrote:
Next iteration I would try human:INF + forts zombies:militia. makes more sense, swarms of slow moving things and people hiding out in forts.
Quasi-duck wrote:
My stack of inf seems to be beating militia. At least I hope you mean inf, because here int means interceptor.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
Yes I meant INF. But the point of militia vs INF is independent of forts and offense vs defense. You can generate more power and HP per time and support upkeep on more power and HP with militia vs INF. The only thing INF have going for them is speed. If you are thinking in terms of 1 INF vs 1 militia you are thinking about it wrong.
-
DxC wrote:
Yes I meant INF. But the point of militia vs INF is independent of forts and offense vs defense. You can generate more power and HP per time and support upkeep on more power and HP with militia vs INF. The only thing INF have going for them is speed. If you are thinking in terms of 1 INF vs 1 militia you are thinking about it wrong.
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
I see inf winning.Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
no, they dont.
Under most circumstances, Miltia win
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
Quasi-duck wrote:
DxC wrote:
My point is that militia+forts vs INT is more powerful than INT+forts vs militia. Or more simply, forget the forts, militia should win against INT.
Pax Romana Communications Officer
-
StrangeTalent wrote:
youre using a stack of 15 inf against stacks of 2 militia...
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
Quasi-duck wrote:
StrangeTalent wrote:
youre using a stack of 15 inf against stacks of 2 militia...
If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
-Friedrich von Haye
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0