Friendly Banter

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • oceanhawk wrote:

      Quasi-duck wrote:

      Hey, @oceanhawk, did you know in 1968 Reagan signed an act that was aimed at diminishing the rights of black people in California?
      Are you referring to the Mulford act? and that was in 1967
      Oh, where I read it said it was '68.

      But yes, I do mean the Mulford Act.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      Quasi-duck wrote:

      Hey, @oceanhawk, did you know in 1968 Reagan signed an act that was aimed at diminishing the rights of black people in California?
      Are you referring to the Mulford act? and that was in 1967
      Oh, where I read it said it was '68.
      But yes, I do mean the Mulford Act.
      Well, it wasnt diminishing the rights of Black people.. .

      It was diminishing the right to carry arms in public, but it wasnt limited to Black People or White People



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      Well, it wasnt diminishing the rights of Black people.. .

      It was diminishing the right to carry arms in public, but it wasnt limited to Black People or White People

      purplepizza117 wrote:

      Absolutely true. It was meant so that Black Panther groups couldn't patrol neighbourhoods with loaded guns.
      Neither of you seem to understand what the BPP was doing.....


      The BPP were patrolling the streets of Oakland, CA. to stop police brutality against black people. They would stand back from an arrest, with loaded guns, and make sure the police did not break the law.

      Then this law came in, which outlawed then protecting themselves and each other.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      Well, it wasnt diminishing the rights of Black people.. .

      It was diminishing the right to carry arms in public, but it wasnt limited to Black People or White People

      purplepizza117 wrote:

      Absolutely true. It was meant so that Black Panther groups couldn't patrol neighbourhoods with loaded guns.
      Neither of you seem to understand what the BPP was doing.....

      The BPP were patrolling the streets of Oakland, CA. to stop police brutality against black people. They would stand back from an arrest, with loaded guns, and make sure the police did not break the law.

      Then this law came in, which outlawed then protecting themselves and each other.
      So a bit like in rouge valley the other day?

      The police are there to enforce the law, if they fail to do so, that doesnt mean that the power shifts to a random group of armed terrorists



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      So a bit like in rouge valley the other day?
      What?

      oceanhawk wrote:

      The police are there to enforce the law, if they fail to do so, that doesnt mean that the power shifts to a random group of armed terrorists
      Tell me that after being hospitalised because you were caught speeding. They were not terrorists either, what they did was within their rights, and completely lawful.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      So a bit like in rouge valley the other day?
      What?

      oceanhawk wrote:

      The police are there to enforce the law, if they fail to do so, that doesnt mean that the power shifts to a random group of armed terrorists
      Tell me that after being hospitalised because you were caught speeding. They were not terrorists either, what they did was within their rights, and completely lawful.
      Baton Rouge I meant


      What is happening in America is horrible and wrong, but having a group of marxist idiotic people running around with guns, trying to start another civil war



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      What is happening in America is horrible and wrong, but having a group of marxist idiotic people running around with guns, trying to start another civil war
      This was in the 60's, it was completely lawful, the people were all actually incredibly smart, and were not trying to start another civil war.

      It really says something about you when call a black civil rights group idiots and terrorists.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      What is happening in America is horrible and wrong, but having a group of marxist idiotic people running around with guns, trying to start another civil war
      This was in the 60's, it was completely lawful, the people were all actually incredibly smart, and were not trying to start another civil war.
      It really says something about you when call a black civil rights group idiots and terrorists.
      Wasnt much civil about them....



      No, Luther was smart, when he wanted no violence



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      Wasnt much civil about them....
      How? Everything was within in the law, and it was to make the police more civil.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      No, Luther was smart, when he wanted no violence
      Neither did the BPP, but the police did.
      You serious?

      The Black panthers, had shoot outs with police, they tried to conduct bombings



      They did set out to use violence. Walking around marching in black uniform clothing, carrying rifles.



      If Socialists understood Economics, they wouldn't be socialists
      -Friedrich von Haye


    • oceanhawk wrote:

      The Black panthers, had shoot outs with police, they tried to conduct bombings
      You idiot.... Look up Fred Hampton. Most of that was COINTELPRO bs.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      They did set out to use violence. Walking around marching in black uniform clothing, carrying rifles.
      That isn't setting out to use violence.... That is called forming a militia, which is protected under US law. Granted they did not have it recognised by the state, but the state would not have let them form a black civil rights militia anyway.
      :00000441: Forum Gang Commissar :00000441:

      Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:



    • Quasi-duck wrote:

      oceanhawk wrote:

      The Black panthers, had shoot outs with police, they tried to conduct bombings
      You idiot.... Look up Fred Hampton. Most of that was COINTELPRO bs.

      oceanhawk wrote:

      They did set out to use violence. Walking around marching in black uniform clothing, carrying rifles.
      That isn't setting out to use violence.... That is called forming a militia, which is protected under US law. Granted they did not have it recognised by the state, but the state would not have let them form a black civil rights militia anyway.
      Remember the part about banter?

      this is not banter.