Girlpower!
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Lizzy wrote:
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
Panzer vor! -
aphGermany wrote:
Lizzy wrote:
Personpower! never thought of that, good one. I was thinking human resources as used in industry. Happy to go with personpower.
-
purplepizza117 wrote:
ShadowHawk5 wrote:
I swear if they change it from manpower to personpower or some gender neutral bs imma hunt you down and kill you xD
-
purplepizza117 wrote:
King Draza Mihajlovic wrote:
"girlpower!"
Feminists would be triggered if they see a female infantry division going against a heavy tank division
_________________________
Girlpower (Trigger Warning)
The amount you can currently use, certainly not in stock, that makes it sound like the women are slaves: 43,192
Women who can currently volunteer to fight for you (don't rush us or it's sexism, check your privilege): 13,762 per day
Most women who you can have, if you have more, you're a member of the patriarchy: 223,497
How much women your sexist tank divisions use per day as opposed to the oppressive men:
- Units: 3,426 per day
- Total: 3,426 per day
See, you know, that's how I would do it. That way we don't offend any of our good ol' friends... Except realists.
- Units: 3,426 per day
-
-
-
I quite like this idea.
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
aphGermany wrote:
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!
Most of the posters have taken this the way it was intended, but some seem to have had a SOH bypass, unless of course you are joking too.
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it. -
Lizzy wrote:
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it.
It's been a while -
Lizzy wrote:
aphGermany wrote:
Okay, here's how it is. The term 'manpower' is just a generic term used to describe how many workers/recruits you can use to build a battalion/regiment/brigade/division/corps/army etc. Down with making history politically correct!
Most of the posters have taken this the way it was intended, but some seem to have had a SOH bypass, unless of course you are joking too.
Anyway sorry if I have upset anyone, I didn't mean it.
-
purplepizza117 wrote:
worldwar2history wrote:
Omg that is so cruel
wildL SPQR wrote:
This is a giant leap for mankind!
Quasi-duck wrote:
I quite like this idea.
-
worldwar2history wrote:
why are you guys so flippin cruel!!!!
It's been a while -
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
-
Lord Asher wrote:
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
Quasi-duck wrote:
Lord Asher wrote:
She sounds like those triggered Feminazi's who got angry there's no women in Battlefield One.
-
Oh you want reporting? I didn't realise.
-
Lizzy wrote:
Oh you want reporting? I didn't realise.
Forum Gang Commissar
Black Lives Matter!!!!! All Lives Matter!!!!!
-
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee noooooooooo
-
What are we going to get in trouble for? "Not politically correct yet realistic jokes about WW2"?It's been a while
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0