
GreatbigHippo Lieutenant General
- Male
- 103
- from KIC 8462852
- Member since Jun 6th 2015
- Last Activity
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
Ellio_98 -
I will eat your soul if you don't vote for me
-
Caesar -
I'm back.
-
Caesar -
I'm back.
-
Matthias -
Geeez maan... Dat avatar.
-
Caesar -
Interesting avatar.
-
Also, memorization should still be a big part of learning (because how can you have an intelligent conversation if you have to look something up every 5 seconds?) but I do agree that we should spend more time learning how processes work instead of memorizing how to solve problems. It's like my math teacher told the class today: If you only memorize the solution type to a problem type, you're screwed once a part of the problem changes
-
I completely agree. I think memorization would come naturally into the learning process because teachers would have to provide examples to the certain topic. But students should be taught so they can figure out things on their own when they no longer have a teacher to guide them. Also, I figured if you look stuff up every 5 seconds enough, eventually you will know it all and won't have to look it up anymore.
-
-
Nice hobbies; I'll have a philosophical discussion with you any time
-
Oh, goody! I'm logging off for now, but here's something to think about: Why do we still follow a leader/someone with authority IN A ALREADY ESTABLSIHED SYSTEM if we all strongly disagree with/dislike this leader (as in the leader is corrupt, and causes lots of troubles for his subjects like famine or poverty(but not bad enough that his subjects are literally going extinct). Yet if this person wanted to lead outside the already established system we would not allow him to lead, even if that person has the best interest of his subjects in mind. For some reason, humans will accept authority if that authority is declared an authority, yet they won't follow someone who is not declared an authority. It may seem like simple human nature at first, but when I really think about it, this makes no sense. Why will we accept a hated poor leader who gained power by conventional means, yet rarely accept a good leader who attempts to gain power by unconventional means?
-
Pstomar -
Hi