Search Results
Search results 1-20 of 177.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
One important difference between a nuclear bomber and a nuclear rocket is that the nuclear bomber can relocate from one location to another quickly by flying. A nuclear rocket can take ages to travel in convoy to a launch location. Imagine you are Quebec and want to drop a nuke on South Argentina. The bomber takes a handful of hours to get there whilst the rocket takes days
-
It's all valid criticism but then again COW Is not a simulation. Whilst he complains of food in cities he should realise that the same applies to rares etc. Cities should be looked at as processing centres. The oil from the wells, the steel girders and ball bearings, the processed ores in rares, the refining of wheat and grain into flour, cakes etc are all prepared near cities in oil refineries, smelters, bakeries etc which are at the very least on the edges of population centres. Many things in…
-
there are some serious misconceptions about the role of tanks, infantry and the use of combinations thereof. The key feature of WW2 was the use of blitzkrieg tactics. These revolve around finding an enemies key weakness (Schwerpunkt or Centre of Gravity) and rapidly focusing maximum military pressure towards that weakness. Now this is a strategic or theatre level concept but for us we need to focus on 2 key words used above RAPID and MAXIMUM. In order to achieve RAPID we need to move faster and …
-
Quote from OneNutSquirrel: “One of the first Jagpanther (German Anti tank) engagements was 3 of them attacking a dozen British tanks... ” don't use one example to illustrate your point especially when it is the first use of a new weapon. Counter tactics are then developed and this rate of success disappears.